Content of st379 - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account

st379

registered user
  • Number of messages

    97
  • Join

  • Recently visited

Anything posted by st379

  1. 11600k received not bad reviews but the 11900k was killed. The 11700k also loses in some previous generation games at anandtech. If you need 8 cores the previous generation is better and also consumes less electricity. I do not understand how on site these processors look so good. In short either series 10 or amd for those who need over 6 cores.
  2. Even in the blender the Gamer nexus and unboxed hardware results are less good. They are very reliable and I find the results on the site weird. You may want to run them again. This processor has taken a step back in terms of gaming performance and productivity. This is Intel's Bulldozer Lake. Not to mention 300 watts of power consumption.
  3. Really weird results ... Hardbox unboxed and gamernexus got worse results than previous generation and probably from amd. Strange that in your Intel review you look so good. They called the processor pathetic and sh * t. It seemed strange when most of the critics got bad results in gaming and productivity. Average results of 10 games by hardware unboxed: 5900x 201fps 5800x 197 fps 10900k 196fps 11900k 192fps
  4. Not exactly the most reliable source. The 3080 and 3090 by 10% difference there is not too much to maneuver here, I'm talking about performance not price. The 3070 and 3080 where there is more room to push some card in the middle. Edit: Pretty aggressive pricing $ 500 and $ 700 so another ticket at $ 600? Also the prices will have to be adjusted and it seems a bit difficult to release something right now. It is not that they have a year on the market and are now releasing powerful versions.
  5. @ nec_000 I talked about the IO. For some reason your comment has been deleted and I do not see it. They are committed to GF will not be minimized nor is there a reason. GFs also work at 12nm + which should be significantly more efficient. Can't believe we've seen 24 cores. When there is no competition there is no motivation to release such a processor. It is reserved for TR4.
  6. Announced that there will be no new chipset. Regarding minimization they must by contract continue with Globalfoundries so there will be no minimization.
  7. @ nec_000 CPU does reach 100 percent you just do not see it because not all cores are utilized. And not how do you explain that with rtx 2080 ti you see differences between the processors on 1080p? Of course no sane person buys an rtx 2080 ti with a 10400 so you are right that in most cases the video card is the problem in the highest settings and not the CPU.
  8. The truth is if AMD does not lead in gaming it will be quite sad. Skylake is an architecture from 2016.
  9. This is on the condition that the game utilizes 10 cores. I think 40% is a bit excessive. This is not video editing software, I doubt this game needs so many cores and is probably more affected by frequency and IPC.
  10. I do not like to draw conclusions based on one game but it is faster than 20% of the Reisen 3800x and 15% faster than 10900k. So first of all you can see an improvement if you compare the processors to an earlier generation of AMD, and again it is difficult to draw conclusions from one game but you can see a significant improvement compared to the previous generation of AMD. Will all games see a 15% improvement? probably not. You can see but it will be very close and maybe AMD will lead quite a few games.
  11. Beautiful. 15% faster than 10900k. Even though it's just one game, it looks promising.
  12. rocket lake 14nm ++++++++++++++++ is coming this year or at the beginning of next year at the latest. Alder Lake 10nm ++++++ is coming in the second half of 2021 according to an official presentation from Intel. How much it will be competitive against Zen 3 I do not know but to say that there are no new architectures is not true.
  13. What do you want them to publish? "Well listen friends once again we have failed. This failure has been going on for 4 years and we continue to be stuck until 2023" Yes, it really is great publicity. They are lucky that they manage to reach 5.2 ghz in the processors and Skylake has good overall architecture. The focus is on future channels that may be worth something with the help of the name and if the stars line up and the weather is good.
  14. And still Intel is more profitable than a lot of companies so maybe processing is a lucrative business after all? Intel are failing in their transition to 10 and 7 nm, did not change the focus. Maybe Mobilai will be a dizzying success in 5 years but right now you're just guessing. There is also no logical reason to throw such a profitable business in the trash and the fact that the computers are dead I have been hearing for 5 years. Meanwhile, according to Intel and Amd's earnings, computers are not yet dead. It is good to plan 5 years ahead but there is no reason not to invest in such a profitable business. Maybe Mobilai will make $ 20 billion a quarter, but we will know that for many, many years, probably not now.
  15. German luxury-vehicle maker BMW (OTC: BAMX.F) (OTC: BMWY.Y) said on May 6 that its first-quarter operating profit rose to 1.38 billion euros It seems to me you are confused by $ 90 billion. Amd earn more.
  16. I'm trying to figure out how the revenue from the rest of things will jump by another $ 19 billion. But you're probably a better fortune teller than anyone else because Intel's stock has dropped significantly after the current quarter and announced a one - year delay at 7 nm. In addition to being sued claiming they knew 7 nm would not be ready in time. You are probably predicting a future that investors do not see.
  17. Focus on $ 10 billion in revenue when you have nearly $ 14 billion in expenses? This is very smart. Intel has been failing in recent years to move on to the next lithograph. There is no focus here, just a failure of years to drop from XNUMX nm +++++++++++++++++++++.
  18. Revenue of $ 17 billion out of $ 20 billion on processors and they do not care? I probably miss all the "diversity" that Intel has. Another $ 2 billion on the ssd is not diverse at all. All the other things unrelated to processors and ssd put in only about a billion dollars. It's a lot of money but compared to 19 billion processors and ssd it's nothing. Processors make up almost all of their profit, $ 17 billion. ssd in second place.
  19. It's a little unclear to me why this is needed. Measure portable and in rest mode they consume 1 watt Why should tangle and laker? Don't see it developing anywhere, maybe for cell phones. Just increases the heat and it's known that Intel's processors love to reach 300 watts on servers and desktops.
  20. @ nec_000 I told you they have processors under $ 300 very interesting and should not go k. You were too hasty to rule them out. I don't like Intel either, but they have come to realize that they need to compare or they will be in trouble.
  21. It all depends on whether they can make the transition to euv. Hard to know. In any case, it is excellent that amd take them market share but in the meanwhile with their competition their profits rise and do not decrease. Even now with proper pricing they can give Fayette to Zen 3 and have some architectures on the way and a lot more money to pour on development and research. If they fail with the transition they will be in trouble.
  22. Not far away ... Client Computing Group Revenue $ 9.8B Data Center Group Revenue $ 7.0B Intel can absorb a year with less profits. They will not have to screw up with 7nm.
  23. There are software that only works with Intel so you have to choose them. For example, the popular video editing software avid and more. It's hard to talk about prices because Intel can make adjustments and that's just a guess. The 3900x also cost close to $ 600 at first and you could argue that it doesn't pay off, but there are some that aren't waiting. I was careful as you noticed when I mentioned the 7nm and recorded that it could be "successful" like the 10nm. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember $ 10 billion in desktop and mobile profits that are higher than servers if I remember correctly. Only 5 times more than amd did in the quarter.
×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site