Fighter jets - a few questions - Page 12 - Science and Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

Fighter planes - a few questions


mrsph666

Recommended Posts

Enter the details of the planes themselves, usually registered name.

In my opinion, everyone except the pilot is only down and up, although it does not really make sense for F22 to move only down and up, it does not need VTOL or STOL like the F35.

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 265
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

Prominent participants in the discussion

Prominent participants in the discussion

Well the S47 is still experimental... and I saw how one flew like that ... just a pleasure : xyxthumbs:

And I agree with that F16 is effective in close air battles ... I "protest" the fact that unlike 29, the F16 can not do 3-4 (do not catch me with the word ... I've seen F16 meanwhile making 2 consecutive loops, and MAG makes 2 loops , But faster and sharper ... I guess he could carry at least one more ...) Lupes in succession, because he will process power and fall like a stone.

As I mentioned the S47 no longer exists, it crashed

Link to content
Share on other sites

As I mentioned the S47 no longer exists, it crashed

When did he crash? I saw one that flew in 2005 (a little less than a year ago ...)

And no longer produce that is expensive and should be improved ...

Link to content
Share on other sites

This is not called a fan that is called cnp.

The fan is the inside of the receiver because it is called a turbine / fan motor because of the moving part inside.

The part of the steering wheel that creates the vector steering does not have rotating parts, so it is not called a fan. Whoever told you this nonsense simply does not understand what it is about.

There are motors that the fan is preparing to prevent stalls - there are fan blades that have minimal movement and do not rotate but only move left and right as cm and aim to divert air that will not be directly hit fan.

That is probably what the person you spoke to meant not to be censored.

Link to content
Share on other sites

This is not called a fan that is called cnp.

The fan is the inside of the receiver because it is called a turbine / fan motor because of the moving part inside.

The part of the steering wheel that creates the vector steering does not have rotating parts, so it is not called a fan. Whoever told you this nonsense simply does not understand what it is about.

There are motors that the fan is preparing to prevent stalls - there are fan blades that have minimal movement and do not rotate but only move left and right as cm and aim to divert air that will not be directly hit fan.

That is probably what the person you spoke to meant not to be censored.

Strengthens the words of the SS. : xyxthumbs:

In Hebrew the back of a jet engine is called a nozzle,

Link to content
Share on other sites

This is not called a fan that is called cnp.

The fan is the inside of the receiver because it is called a turbine / fan motor because of the moving part inside.

The part of the steering wheel that creates the vector steering does not have rotating parts, so it is not called a fan. Whoever told you this nonsense simply does not understand what it is about.

There are motors that the fan is preparing to prevent stalls - there are fan blades that have minimal movement and do not rotate but only move left and right as cm and aim to divert air that will not be directly hit fan.

That is probably what the person you spoke to meant not to be censored.

OK, agree with you ... It must have been some nickname that the lecturer and the people he worked with (in NASA ...) called this part ... but on the other hand, even though he is an Israeli 100% he could barely connect two words properly : nixweiss:

Link to content
Share on other sites

Here, the F22 can move its exhaust pipe only up / down ...

http://www.f-22raptor.com/af_engines.php

By the way, I saw somewhere a video on one of the SUs with similar capability, and its performance was just completely delusional ... Show a diagram of a loop that SU makes in relation to a similar plane only without the movement of the exhaust pipe, and the radius of its rotation being smaller than the radius of the second. ..

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

  • Popular now

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site