Question about Time - Page 2 - Science and Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

A question about time


zorgi

Recommended Posts

There is some problem with this theory of Planck's sizes. It may hold but it does not fit in with some new measurements from Abel. And if you take certain string theories, the whole thing goes to hell with the entire boat of tachyonim

Yes, but if you throw in the principle of natural units you can throw a lot of quantum mechanics in the bin ...

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 37
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

Prominent participants in the discussion

Prominent participants in the discussion

not exactly. Only the unified field theories (which also fall and rise every two days). Any attempt to put ratios (AKA light velocity) into quantum (AKA Planck sizing) in two years is simply unstable and unsubstantiated.

Link to content
Share on other sites

You could say the whole universe moves at a rate of a second and nobody knows it because he and his generation feel this second like let's say 10 trillion years..But for the universe you went from 0 to 1 and the time it takes you to get there is infinite. It's that we humans have decided that quantization needs to be done - not to say it's the most accurate way to define infitism.

Link to content
Share on other sites

not exactly. Only the unified field theories (which also fall and rise every two days). Any attempt to put ratios (AKA light velocity) into quantum (AKA Planck sizing) in two years is simply unstable and unsubstantiated.

http://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%AA_%D7%94%D7%A9%D7%93%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%94%D7%A7%D7%95%D7%95%D7%A0%D7%98%D7%99%D7%AA

So unstable and unfounded, that it merely predicted the existence of anti-particles. : - \

To choose the one above, we decided that quantization needed? We found out how this works today - there is a difference. For thousands of years they thought everything was continuous.

Link to content
Share on other sites

From what I understood there is a "Planck Time" which is the smallest time unit that can be.

So now another question:

Two clocks (say precision to Planck level) show the same initial time. One clock will remain on Earth, and the other will start moving in space within a spacecraft moving at a speed of 30% of the speed of light.

The question: How many Planck units will travel on Earth's clock while the clock on the spaceship has moved to one Planck unit? That is, there is the possibility that even the most time unit that exists is not fixed, and there may be a situation where one Minimal Plank unit is smaller than another minimum plank unit.

And it's also interesting to know how the plank fits in with the speed of light.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Your mistake of thinking about measurement in the deterministic sense, and converting Planck time between systems. Planck time is absolute defined by the speed of light, it does not vary between reference systems

Link to content
Share on other sites

It's a concept you're not used to thinking about. According to this perception time is not as fixed as you think like most things in the world. It's like you obviously think that nothing can exist in 2 places at the same time, and there are particles that exist in a large number of places at the same time (I think 6) and are basically the same particle ... if one spinning is all rotating and it is simply a perception that the human brain does not yet know and therefore It's so hard for him to think she makes sense. If you were living your whole life in reality that time is changing like a speed example your friend would fly to another galaxy and when he came back you would already be old and he would not ... then it would make sense to you. Such a phenomenon is not encountered in everyday life and is therefore easily incomprehensible.

Link to content
Share on other sites

From what I understood there is a "Planck Time" which is the smallest time unit that can be.

So now another question:

Two clocks (say precision to Planck level) show the same initial time. One clock will remain on Earth, and the other will start moving in space within a spacecraft moving at a speed of 30% of the speed of light.

The question: How many Planck units will travel on Earth's clock while the clock on the spaceship has moved to one Planck unit? That is, there is the possibility that even the most time unit that exists is not fixed, and there may be a situation where one Minimal Plank unit is smaller than another minimum plank unit.

And it's also interesting to know how the plank fits in with the speed of light.

Great question!

Really wonder who can answer that. By what time tea says, there is no condition - that is, say a second at the speed of light that is equal to a normal second at normal speed (by the way, where do we think the entire solar system does not rotate at the speed of our light or galaxy?) And in relation to why do we move at the speed of light ??

Link to content
Share on other sites

In principle according to relativity it is impossible for the solar system or anything to move at the speed of light because it means that it is impossible to go even half a cm per second faster because the reference system to which we are talking will then go beyond the speed of light.

What I also realized is that material cannot reach the speed of light.

Link to content
Share on other sites

You did a bit of a mess. There is no stopping the solar system from moving at 0.99 from the speed of light, and we within the solar system (came out a bit overcast) move at 0.99 from the speed of light with respect to it. To an external viewer, it will appear as if we are moving at 0.999999 speed of light (I did not accurately calculate, hope you understand the intention).

The Planak dimensions, are built on what we perceive as constants of the universe. Values ​​that do not vary between reference systems and different conditions (which is why some books call them "the Divine Dimensions", and it is believed that these are the dimensions that a super-advanced alien race will use)

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site