The Jericho missile - how is it compared to other missiles? - Science & Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

The Jericho missile - how is it compared to other missiles?


q1234

Recommended Posts

how is he ?

Are there more advanced surface-to-surface missiles? Which ?

I would love to have some information about the state's superiority Technologically (like the Arrow missile, the Merkava tank), what else do we have superiority.

Which airplane can be compared to Lavi?

Thanks.

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 97
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

Prominent participants in the discussion

Prominent participants in the discussion

The relative technological superiority of the state The Arab countries is not expressed in its land and ground missiles. Israel has the ability to strike at the Arab states and vice versa.

The superiority of Is reflected in the advanced electronic warfare industry, air-to-air missiles (5 python - the short-range air-to-air missile currently in the world). In all our military industries bear fruit, but beyond that our superiority is only because the United States decides to remind us of more advanced military tools than what most of our enemy states have (like the F15). The problem is that lately the gap between our instincts has been narrowing. The Egyptians have advanced F16 aircraft, in addition to a tank equivalent to the 3 (courtesy of the Americans), they have advanced cruise missiles launched from missile ships (also courtesy of the United States), and more ... Of course we are still superior to the air force and the combat doctrine on which it is based The war against the war doctrine of the Arab states (based on the Soviet system - at least was the case in wars To this day).

Our greatest advantage at the moment is our nuclear option, which according to foreign sources has Israel over 200 nuclear warheads and contributed different size nuclei that can be launched from planes or surface-to-surface missiles. I very much hope that this advantage will also be preserved and not erased by the Iranians.

Link to content
Share on other sites

1. They say the arrow is ineffective against the Shihab 3, how true is that?

2. The Iranians claim that they have a missile that avoids you. What answer do we have or the United States?

Still, I would like to know if a better missile, Jericho or Shihab, and what good surface-to-surface missiles there is more.

Thanks. :)

Link to content
Share on other sites

1. The arrow is designed for the love of 3 ...

2. A missile skips radar, I do not think so-think how much money the US spent for a stealth plane. In any event, missiles are being fired today by satellites.

Does it matter which one is better - if their missile reaches us and our missile reaches them?

The claim is that the US has a ground-to-ground missile that can orbit the world, and in any case the US / Russia can reach anywhere in the world with a ground-to-ground missile.

Link to content
Share on other sites

The Iranians are working on a ground-to-ground missile that splits into several parts, some time before it hits the target and is supposed to mislead the Arrow missile not to know which part of the attack, the real or the bait, but the Arrow system is sophisticated and can adapt itself to the threat of the missile, Block "each time to a new one." The Block "is the" brain "of the missile, the software that calculates all the calculations like the missile's trajectory, target identification, and also the identification of the real target. In an experiment conducted a few months ago, the Arrow missile was used to simulate the same missile. In any case, a missile evades radar, according to what is known, there is not even the United States or Russia, nor any other country, certainly not Iran, and if they do have such a thing, what is not likely at all is an impressive technological breakthrough. The individual to the Arrow missile, whether capable of attacking the target or not, has no efficiency for the following reason: how much Arrow is currently in Israel? 4-3? Let's assume that we even have 8 Tali Hetz diasporas scattered throughout the country. If the Iranians really want to attack us, they will consider this figure and will try to launch a few dozen missiles at us with one stroke, if not more. How many missiles can we intercept? It's quite negligible. About the accuracy of the missiles. The Jericho missile from the last model of the It seems to be more accurate than the "3", until recently the Shihab accuracy was about hitting a range of accuracy of several kilometers but the Iranians tried to improve its accuracy, I have no idea if they succeeded or not.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Even if the arrow was 10 better, I would not trust it.

And I do not think the arrow is a bad missile.

A simple anti-missile missile is not something that works at 100%. And that a nuclear warhead with a nuclear warhead would be sent to Israel.

Link to content
Share on other sites

There is no direct connection. I'm talking about whether you would trust the arrow in front of you to love with a nuclear warhead?

It's too big a gamble. Every time you decide whether to attack or not, you have to ignore the arrow. As far as I'm concerned, it's as if a lover can hurt.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Define based on scientific evidence? In the meantime, all the evidence about the person claims that he did not develop from a certain species, more precisely any missing "link" found or lived in parallel with Homo sapiens or was not directly related to him in any form.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Define based on scientific evidence? In the meantime, all the evidence about the person claims that he did not develop from a certain species, more precisely any missing "link" found or lived in parallel with Homo sapiens or was not directly related to him in any form.

??

Link to content
Share on other sites

Define based on scientific evidence? In the meantime, all the evidence about the person claims that he did not develop from a certain species, more precisely any missing "link" found or lived in parallel with Homo sapiens or was not directly related to him in any form.

You got confused in the discussion.

Link to content
Share on other sites

The Arrow is the last defense array and its goal is to neutralize threats that did not pass through all the other defense systems. Of course, once the Arrow system is required for real action, we will know that something in our defense system has failed.

The best defense is an attack - so if we want to protect us from Iranian missiles, we have to destroy them - the sooner the better.

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site