The Jericho missile - how is it compared to other missiles? - Page 4 - Science and Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

The Jericho missile - how is it compared to other missiles?


q1234

Recommended Posts

And I would be happy if you would tell me the connection between the post and the United States. . Because the last time I checked she was not in the Middle East ...::)

In any case, their base of experiments in the 51 region is the main waste of Lockheed Martin's "Slater Factory" development projects and all its evasive technologies. For us, the problem is that there is no budget, so there is nothing to waste, but there is something.

The company, the Qassam that reached the most 9 mile traveled by recent reports.

Syrian Katyusha (BM21) reaches about a kilometer 32. And has a slightly more lethal "Qassam" warhead than Qassam, armed with standard Betty TNT and no mixtures of fertilizers for agriculture.

This system is still experimenting at all.

I always said that the problem of It's oil.

We simply do not have the money to be a superpower.

There was a joke about it in Jay Leno, about oil.

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 97
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

Prominent participants in the discussion

Prominent participants in the discussion

This is the "nautilus", a laser cannon that was initially intended to be used against short-range Katyusha rockets when it could destroy several targets within a few seconds and the facility itself was supposed to be inside a small, non-portable structure.

Now, he's going through a process Which is supposed to turn it into a cannon Anti-aircraft and also try to match it to be able to be On a truck fitted for this. If it succeeds it's going to be The best anti-aircraft in the world that no airplane could escape.

In connection with the war against the Arab states. Our biggest problem is that we must not lose a war even once. I think that if the Arab states develop a surprise attack on us and we will not be ready for it, I believe that in such a case the way to use an atomic bomb will be quite short ...

Link to content
Share on other sites

Regarding the Arrow missiles:

As for the missiles, the "Harav Magen" unit (not secret, has already been published by the army) operates Arrow missiles in the air force.

What else? The batteries are scattered throughout the country around strategic points. For example: Jerusalem (the Knesset, for example), near Beit Shemesh (Tel Nof base, and a green forest with hills ...), Tel Aviv (the kraya for example), Dimona (carpet factory).

The idea is for everyone to think we are weak. In fact, you will not see the batteries in the classified places, because they are underground and above them there is a structure that moves when needed.

The batteries are above ground and there are many of them.

The most important part of the system is the green pine radar and where are the macrometers or their number I can not say.

And we have systems that citizens can only dream of at night, that's why I said you can sleep peacefully

Link to content
Share on other sites

And I would be happy if you would tell me the connection between the post and the United States. . Because the last time I checked she was not in the Middle East ...::)

The connection is that you say that this missile is the best in the world, and the US is included in the same world, is not it? And it has better missiles::)

Link to content
Share on other sites

And I would be happy if you would tell me the connection between the post and the United States. . Because the last time I checked she was not in the Middle East ...::)

So the last time you checked was a few years ago, because Iraq has a pretty serious American military presence that is really changing the balance of power in the Middle East.

Syria and Iran are very afraid of an American invasion ...

Link to content
Share on other sites

The batteries are above ground and there are many of them.

just a question . . . I guess you speak as one of the unit ?! ::)

Always remember. No matter what, there is a unitary compartmentalization, which even soldiers serving there do not know some of the things. For her senior officers, that's something else.

The connection is that you say that this missile is the best in the world, and the US is included in the same world, is not it? And it has better missiles::)

And you're a friend I guess - talking because you know at all what you're talking about ?! ::)

Trust my word. There are things that the Arabs will discover only in wartime. Two missile missiles from within what I said (no matter how many more advanced systems I spoke at the time) are not firing at the Palestinians now, because if that happens, their parts will fall into the technical laboratories of Arab intelligence in the entire country in the Middle East. Says about missile capabilities.

So the last time you checked was a few years ago, because Iraq has a pretty serious American military presence that is really changing the balance of power in the Middle East.

Syria and Iran are very afraid of an American invasion ...

That it has to do with our technological superiority, because ?!

Link to content
Share on other sites

And you're a friend I guess - talking because you know at all what you're talking about ?! ::)

Trust my word. There are things that the Arabs will discover only in wartime. Two missile missiles from within what I said (no matter how many more advanced systems I spoke at the time) are not firing at the Palestinians now, because if that happens, their parts will fall into the technical laboratories of Arab intelligence in the entire country in the Middle East. Says about missile capabilities.

Say what you said was related to what I said? You claim that Israel has the best weapons and it is classified, but you do not even know what the US has. In short, the IDF's classified weapons are not the best in the world.

Link to content
Share on other sites

You scare me with all this information on the web.

Although personally I think it is useful for the deterrent effect (very important)

Relax a bit and let's close down that there are things that most of us do not know and should not know.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Trust my word. There are things that the Arabs will discover only in wartime. Two missile missiles from within what I said (no matter how many more advanced systems I spoke at the time) are not firing at the Palestinians now, because if that happens, their parts will fall into the technical laboratories of Arab intelligence in the entire country in the Middle East. Says about missile capabilities.

You are talking about these missiles as if this is the fate of an all-out war. Even if we assume that the target of such a missile is destroyed by the probability of 100, this percentage is still not what will stop thousands of tanks and hundreds of thousands of soldiers who will attack us from all sides during wartime.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Say what you said was related to what I said? You claim that Israel has the best weapons and it is classified, but you do not even know what the US has. In short, the IDF's classified weapons are not the best in the world.

First of all, do not argue. You do not even know what we have and what I mean. This is not a post about "the army of someone who is stronger." I said that in certain things we have superiority.

Basically, there are bombs designed to hit armor battalions ...

You mean cluster shells with kinetic intrusions and pattern developments, but that's to say, it does not penetrate nearly and it does not disable a tank.

I am talking about a guided missile that strikes and disables all existing Western and Eastern combat brigades.

You are talking about these missiles as if this is the fate of an all-out war. Even if we assume that the target of such a missile is destroyed by the probability of 100, this percentage is still not what will stop thousands of tanks and hundreds of thousands of soldiers who will attack us from all sides during wartime.

Take as an example the Syrian army with the most powerful eastern weapon in the vicinity and the Egyptian as an army with the most powerful Western weapons in the vicinity M1 Abrahams Block A1 (A2 block that includes diluted uranium shielding Americans refuse to sell to Egypt, and good for that).

In spite of what you think, the amount of Syrian tanks that will be usable to jump to war at this moment is not that high. Their technical system is lacking.

While there is more protection and weapons in Egypt, it is not yet the same level of minds that are operating them, remember the Russian pilots who always flew the planes to Egypt, although this is not yet kosher like Israel does.

Suppose there is a jeep with 10 missiles on it and a likely 98% hit, this destroys 10 tanks. Now let's say that there are jeeps like this that stand in line on top of a mountain range in the Negev and launch them on enemy tanks (the Egyptians are still fine with us, so we will not exaggerate this moment). What are you as soldiers in the battlefield you would do after seeing that from somewhere "from the sky" (the missiles fly high and then go down on targets) blow up your friends, or the armored battalion before you. Would you continue standing there as heroes and waiting for the next wave ?! No, you would retreat.

This is the intention of the Israeli systems, like any missile currently under development in the world. First of all extermination, and then the side effect - psychological warfare following the injury.

That is why I say that once we have something that harms tanks, ships or planes, it is already winning the war.

Look at the Americans. . . They are stuck because they have no real army to fight it. It's like in the territories and that's why it's hard to win in urban warfare. They occupied Iraq within a week, but they occupied only a desert without an army.

And now they are stuck in the mud there because they are fighting against Arabs with guns and RPGs. A moths to make sex Such as "raising people in a large area without destruction to the environment (I am not talking about a hydrogen bomb) will continue to be problems in the war with ordinary people.

And then you really can say that we do not have an advantage any longer Will stand before us - we have a high chance of winning. It's not just that the Arabs did not fight with us from 73. Our deterrence is strong, and it is not for nothing. They know that what we are suggesting is that we have - we really do.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Let's say he does a much bigger boom.

Incidentally, in connection with Nautilus, in the US, an experiment of a fully operational prototype of the Nautilus (including the Green Pine radar, etc.)

The Americans got a Katyusha battery, launched 4 rounds of Katyushas each. The result - every wave of Katyushas was liquidated within one second. Not a single Katyusha was destroyed.

By the way, the Nautilus is not a system The laser is fired from the Nautilus puncturing a hole in the warhead of the missile that is intercepted, and then there are 2 options - or the threatening missile explodes, or the warhead becomes useless, and it falls off without a "laser that touches something and something explodes". Danger of explosion

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

  • Popular now

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site