Mac vs. PC - Page 2 - Linux, Mac and other operating systems - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

Mac vs. PC


Recommended Posts

  • תגובות 845
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

I bring you Link from Knowledge, a recording studio that uses the Mac to their satisfaction.

http://www.yeda.co.il/Pro/hook/hook4.html

This is indeed an advertising web page, but there are serious complaints from studio managers about the operating system And the way its resources are distributed in the Mac's work.

I would like to hear: What do you think of these claims? Will they remain relevant even when Vista comes out?

And what do you think about what they said for the Mac?

Link to content
Share on other sites

I bring you Link from Knowledge, a recording studio that uses the Mac to their satisfaction.

http://www.yeda.co.il/Pro/hook/hook4.html

This is indeed an advertising web page, but there are serious complaints from studio managers about the operating system And the way its resources are distributed in the Mac's work.

I would like to hear: What do you think of these claims? Will they remain relevant even when Vista comes out?

And what do you think about what they said for the Mac?

These claims are really nonsense in the juice, I work on Mac at work and also have leakage It's actually more serious, and the Mac also crashes. Sometimes you find yourself looking at an hour on a colored wheel when it is released.

The main advantage of the Mac simply is not currently .

Link to content
Share on other sites

These claims are really nonsense in the juice, I work on the Mac at work and also has a memory leak more severe, and the Mac sometimes collapses you find yourself looking at an hour on a colored wheel in the event that it will be released.

The main advantage of the Mac is that there are currently no viruses.

I'm working with Mac not new and not strong at all (iMac G4 800Mhz) with older versions of Final Cut Pro and DVD Studio Pro, and it's not nearly a course. From my experience, I usually create courses when there are hardware malfunctions, especially external hardware that is not suitable for the job they gave them (eg External for editing Which is not reliable enough and / or is not suitable for working with the same software).

Link to content
Share on other sites

I'm working with Mac not new and not strong at all (iMac G4 800Mhz) with older versions of Final Cut Pro and DVD Studio Pro, and it's not nearly a course. From my experience, I usually create courses when there are hardware malfunctions, especially external hardware that is not suitable for the job they gave them (eg For external video editing that is not reliable enough and / or is not suitable for working with the same software).

The Mac crashes sometimes regardless of hardware malfunctions, sometimes while the software work closes abruptly you will find the problem? There are no Dump files only in the system log.

I do not understand why people try to show the mak that peak of perfection? Like all Has its fads, I worked on OS X, AIX WIN of all kinds, IRIX for all these systems have been crashes from time to time.

By the way: I'm already on Vista! I had only one blue screen because of a bad driver of Nudia, and now the system is remarkably stable.

[attachment deleted by admin]

Link to content
Share on other sites

It's true that in principle Mac OS X is also collapsing, but I can tell you with all due respect that I have not seen the message you've just seen

When I was working on System 9 then I got to see such screens much more but in my pc was then 98 so it crashed at least five times

post Scriptum. Both PC and Mac are the most common cause of this crash Apple has the very great advantage of both producing the computer and the operating system so they can adjust On levels that Microsoft could only dream about

PS Look at my signature to see another reason that is better than Mac

Link to content
Share on other sites

PS Look at my signature to see another reason that is better than Mac

That is, Think ahead of this thing six years ago I was afraid of called "Bug 00" or "Bug 2000"? For those who do not know, the intention was to be strange to machines that support only two digits per year that they will move from 99 to 00 and this will cause them to malfunctions.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Macs did not suffer from the 2000 bug because even the first Mac supported a date display to 2020. If you happen to have a Mac of the first generation (already released 20 years ago) and you still use it then you will have to start worrying about 14

Since then, of course, they have extended this time and now Makim support the 60,000 dates for the next few years (according to Wikipedia)

Link to content
Share on other sites

I know that Macs can use very large amounts of memory much more efficiently than PC because if the operating system sees that there is a lot of free memory it will just start using it as a cache,

I disagree with you about where you brought it from? OS X is not much different from Windus in memory management, both systems use virtual memory on the disk once the RAM is over,

In Windows you can control the size of the file and you can also disable it. I for example in heavy games eliminates the file of the WINDOWS WINDOWS because I have a GB 2 , Mac you can not change or cancel it, in this case it seems to me that Windus is smarter.

It happened to me that the system did not give me any possibility of saving a file, because of a lack On the disk, I do not see an advantage here.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Have you read my message at all?

I wrote that Mac was better at exploiting quantities Larger than necessary and you talk about what happens when there is less than necessary

post Scriptum. If I understood you correctly are you complaining about it that Mac OS did not let you save because there was no space on the disc? Obviously, if there is not enough space to keep, then you can not save

Link to content
Share on other sites

Have you read my message at all?

I wrote that Mac was better at exploiting quantities Larger than necessary and you talk about what happens when there is less than necessary

post Scriptum. If I understood you correctly are you complaining about it that Mac OS did not let you save because there was no space on the disc? Obviously, if there is not enough space to keep, then you can not save

So what are you trying to say, more Ram Will the system work better than Windus?

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

  • Popular now

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site