Is light created or is it always there? - Page 15 - Science and Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

Is light created or is it always there?


Recommended Posts

If he is like something from a subconscious mind, then he resembles Tro, with all his links to other sites, and the argument that we have to teach Japanese that we dare to press his mind, and all this without presenting any claim that holds water and / Or brought in neatly, logic is not one of the tools in their toolbox.

Mr. Unknown Why do not you present your claim in an orderly fashion and only then send us to study?

I have not heard this from you yet.

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 220
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

Prominent participants in the discussion

Prominent participants in the discussion

Hey. cute. Do you have a problem reading comprehension? Or perhaps understanding at all? You once again ask me for " שלך "?

If I were talking to a wall made of pure tungsten, reinforced with diamonds and coated with carbon fibers, I would manage to get through the point.

You're a spider made of something I do not know. Somehow, what I say, does not penetrate you.

What do you ask in an orderly fashion? Arguments ??

Claim:

A. The visible and steely universe seemed, all, full and empty, with all its wonders and mysteries nothing more than a set of "static information"

B. "Light" is a disorder that moves and distributes from a given focus in the three-dimensional space in which we exist.

third. The "disturbance" itself is not something physical that changes position like a bullet that goes from point to point. Is simply a process of "information"

D. The "information" values ​​of a given point in a space change when the "disturbance" passes through it and returns to normal when it continues.

God. "Light" was not created. The "data space" simply changes values ​​and sensors (eyes, photovoltaic cells, WHATEVER) perceive the change in values.

and. goddess No Theories My !!!

G. You will not understand anything I wrote, it just seems to you

H. You will understand everything I wrote

ninth. These arguments and claims can not coexist.

More arguments? Lol

Link to content
Share on other sites

Say it was hard?

What is so hard to place your mind in one place?

Amazingly, I do not see anything new and / or anything I object to quickly reading.

Although your "data transfer" form is special - lol

When you say you do not mean you invented and / or discovered, but represents.

The only problem (from a second quick read) that I see in your position is: the lack of clarity in your "thin" position, just like saying everything, may be statistically not really "information"

I will wait for more absolute things. However, I respect you for having (finally, after a lot of milking and effort) what to say (even though it is not worth much, even if I do not read thousands of erasers and spend hours can say - Kosby once said: "An intellectual is one who should read in the book what a normal person knows alone" (Hose)

Of course you have left the marginal detail to define everything you have marked in the quotation marks (hh)

Link to content
Share on other sites

Which of the following is true:

Claim or argument?

Perhaps you do not see anything new and / or anything you oppose, the question is what did you understand and what you conclude from all these claims?

Is the situation really the picture of the situation or is there a flat world standing on the back of four elephants standing on a turtle swimming in the sea?

Now you are requesting settings ?? I can not believe my eyes. I am a dreamer. I'm in another world. I am in a parallel universe. I do not know where I am but it's not a logical place.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Your claims are good and beautiful, but without doing a few things, they are worthless:

1. Define what it means "static information"

2. Define what is "information"

3. Define what is "physical" (as opposed to the information that, according to what you wrote on the claim, G. is not the same)

4. Define what it means to "data space"

5. Define the meaning of "value" (as you wrote in the claim of God) in the "data space" above

After we finished defining the basic concepts,

You must support your claims with proofs (!!!) based on axioms accepted by all of us (if they are not accepted by us all, there is no significance to the evidence being built on them)

And then you can talk

By then,

There is no point in conducting any discussion of a scientific nature (without defining basic axioms and defining the basic concepts)

Link to content
Share on other sites

infer73:

Honestly and without any intention of hurting or belittling your value or patronizing you or anything else that would seem to be directed against you,

What education do you have in the field of physics / mathematics?

I do not care if it is formal or informal and how you have achieved it.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Everything is open not too late

The mood will improve tomorrow

It is possible, it is possible -

As long as we're here singing.

Do you know the song?

Because that's what your assumptions tell me

And I do not have any problem with that

I believe that the universe is infinite and everything is possible

Darling, I know the problem starts with definitions - lol

Link to content
Share on other sites

Say what you want?

I'm afraid you're a little boy who lives in La Bla Land.

Get out of the movie, I got my answers

What do you have with question marks all the time?

You've brought your opinion, I agreed

I asked you to define

You do not define

You ask questions

Release

I tell you - leave!

There is nothing to take you seriously

I stop responding to you with spinach until you behave accordingly

Thanks .

Link to content
Share on other sites

I did not ask what you believed or did not believe and did not ask what you knew or did not know.

I asked what was true or false.

Do you evade songs and dances from the question? : nixweiss:

: xyxthumbs: Lol

Assuming that this is not a private conversation between you and a spider (if so, go to messages And spare us that Thunder)

So I, for example, can not give you an answer to this question (what do I prefer between arguments 7 and 8)

Because, as I wrote, until you explain the terms you use, you can not know what you're saying

And if you do not say what axioms all this is sitting on, as above

infer73:

Honestly and without any intention of hurting or belittling your value or patronizing you or anything else that would seem to be directed against you,

What education do you have in the field of physics / mathematics?

I do not care if it is formal or informal and how you have achieved it.

I asked first. Why should I entertain you with answers if you do not answer me? (Definitions + axioms + proofs, otherwise it's just talk)

Link to content
Share on other sites

So what did we have here?

One delusional and with the whims of a scribe and a junkie-anonymous : bash:: screwy:

One of the idiots is an idiot (according to his claim) who claimed he could understand (potential wise) and said he understood (in doubt) and got answers (who am I to break a word)

Some company with a formal background - you know who you are.

Some company with an unknown background - you also know who you are.

Some company without background - if you do not know who you are, I'm sure you do not know who you are.

It was nice, sometimes amusing and sometimes really horrible.

I apologize if I have caused grief for one or the other.

Conversations with "honor" owners are fun for a different time and place.

You can lock the discussion and let it die or put it in the funny / weird / challenged / whatever hall

Regards. There was peace until the next time. : yelclap:: hi:

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site