Is light created or is it always there? - Page 2 - Science and Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

Is light created or is it always there?


Recommended Posts

Are not all particles not "classic particles"?

I'm pretty sure they've shown that electrons behave like waves under certain conditions, and not only as particles

In the quantum theory one can associate each body with the shape of an appropriate wave. If we take the example of the electrons you mentioned, we can discuss why electrons in the atom do not move in large orbits at will, but rather move in discrete paths of fixed sizes. The answer lies in the quantum calculation: when the electron wave function is recorded in an atom (the wave function is actually the transition between the particle description and the waveform of the electron) Interference destroys itself everywhere except for the paths in which it is actually found (as they found in the experiments) - destructive interference means that the description of the electron particles can not be found in this orbit.

What is "classic"? Maybe you mean arsenic?

Perhaps it is perceived in our limited (temporary) thought as "classic".

When I say classical, the intention here is to separate the classical - Newtonian physics (according to the coming of the quantum theory) and the modern physics that follows it.

As for your question, how is the energy of the photon? So this is a bit of a philosophical question, because the photon itself is energy.

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 220
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

Prominent participants in the discussion

Prominent participants in the discussion

You try to explain the phenomenon through everyday concepts. The problem is that elementary particles, and photons in particular, do not behave the same way you see everyday phenomena.

Not exactly and without going into the philosophy behind science, these particles create the day to day so they will have a connection to the understandings we see every day. But personally, right now, I do not try to apply the quantum understanding of everyday life. I mean, I want to decipher the concept of creation, that is, if a new particle is created. Or maybe this particle was always to say that the level of potential and energy only freed it or created it.

I am talking about the nature of the creation of the particle only. (Of course, if you say that there is no such thing as "creation" in quantum theory, I would be happy to accept it because I am unfortunately not well versed in quantum theory (but who does) (although I hold certain insights of this Torah) (together I think it will be possible to understand more and enrich knowledge ) [br]Published at: 29.05.2009 at 17: 24: 00


cat

As I understood your answer,

Our view and analysis of quantum theory still needs language, that is, mathematics to be explained, and what we do is the operation of computational techniques that may not fit the new knowledge about the structure of matter (at least that is my understanding of your reaction)

Also, why should we apply the mathematics that suits the interpretation of the Newtonian theory of quantum theory? No need and apparently this will not work.

I think that the quantum theory in general teaches us the aspect of will, where parts act in a mixed way and do not "surrender" to one's limited framework of understanding.

Personally I think that if a person wants to be able to be Creator and created a huge step forward in deciphering the uses of particle theory which are the foundation of creation.

This is where my question arises: do we create anything new?

Link to content
Share on other sites

I think you could say that a new particle was created for that matter. Since this is a massless mass (which is different from zero mass, as written earlier), there is no reason why such infinity should be created, for each time an electron decreases at an energy level / any other appropriate reaction - no conservation law is violated.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Spider .. What do you care? A nude belly in Hawaii and photons is what interests you?

And for us.

Can you do a mental cancellation of all the previous information you have accumulated? Everything !!

This is the first part of the answer

Link to content
Share on other sites

I think you could say that a new particle was created for that matter. Since this is a massless mass (which is different from zero mass, as written earlier), there is no reason why such infinity should be created, for each time an electron decreases at an energy level / any other appropriate reaction - no conservation law is violated.

In fact, the energy conservation law and the law of conservation of mass in quantum theory are two faces to the same thing. In the quantum theory there is a parallel between mass and energy (Einstein's famous formula).

Spider spider:

As I understand your problem, you are actually trying to understand one of the most basic questions in physics, what is the essence of the mass or energy of a particle (whether it is an elementary particle like a photon or a particle like an electron). The answer to this is to the sorrow of all of us simply no longer known. Quantum theory does not discuss this question at all and is only a way to explain phenomena observed in experiments and give a mathematical description of what is happening.

There are theories that try to explain the essence of energy or mass (string theory for example), but this is a very theoretical field that we do not have the technological ability to test it.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Spider .. What do you care? A nude belly in Hawaii and photons is what interests you?

You only know between pauses between pineapples and between the glasses and the pussies only

And for us.

Can you do a mental cancellation of all of your previous information? Everything !! - Yes, of course I can (I'm thirsty for new information)

This is the first part of the answer

Expect (humbly :) The second part

Cat:

Everything is already created, and there may be only an exchange of materials that essentially change the essence of matter. We sometimes observe "wrong" and call different compounds by different names according to the use There will be a day in which a person can shape the material reality as he wishes and everything will be from the basis of two materials and so there will be no new names but personal names on actual uses, of course the universal social needs will have a number of names that will gradually diminish because the world is heading towards individualism And subjectivity.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Ya spider slain and idle, turned me a place and mixed me a martini, I'm on my way.

Listen, do not try to design yourself answers before you have relevant information rather than parts from here and there. Physics puzzles are a bad recipe.

Can you imagine the universe as a bubble with nothing physical in it? Just a bubble. What is outside the bubble does not interest you.

Link to content
Share on other sites

: Lol: That's fine for you.

OK.

Forget you right now from the boundaries of the bubble, that's something you can not explore.

Concentrate in the middle somewhere.

Do you know how it sounds and how it moves from point A to point B? If so, write briefly so that we will be in the same position.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Beauty. We are the same. By the way, do not get confused and think I'm patronizing, I'm just making sure I'm joking with him, running the gray cells.

: cool2:

Forget the outer and outer limits of the bubble. Imagine a bubble and somewhere inside it you'll have some frame you want. Border no. B.

There has to be material ... that is, some medium ... something mediator.

Modifies the density of the same ... mediator and his type? To transfer the sound?

Link to content
Share on other sites

You're half the fun. Is it permissible to have a salvage Shimla and two dwarves?

No compression, no compression for distance, it changes the speed at which the wave passes between two points.

What changes the resistance of the "material" is the type of material and its temperature.

If you meant something else, a commentator and an explanation.

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site