Is light created or is it always there? - Page 3 - Science and Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

Is light created or is it always there?


Recommended Posts

No, I did not mean anything else,

If you say that compression changes speed, can I understand that the energy stored in a wave never ends, it only slows down?

did I understand correctly ?

I took the distance as a point where the wave slowed down to the point where it was unable to measure the wave power (or the human hearing ear)

I can understand this one way or another,

Someone said Versatile?

Tell me what, and I'll either agree or ask for clarity.

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 220
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

Prominent participants in the discussion

Prominent participants in the discussion

It does not slow down. It simply dissipates as the wave continues to move away from its source. And it does not. How wonderful and sucked from the finger it sounds.

Remember, we're currently talking about no voice Which is already another "little" story.

(Incidentally, there is also a process produced by Suno , A focused sound wave that does not dissolve)

Up to here, okay?

Link to content
Share on other sites

No compression, no compression for distance, it changes the speed at which the wave passes between two points.

What changes the resistance of the "material" is the type of material and its temperature.

Make no mistake, first you said change the speed and secondly you said between two points,

Now you say diffuse and not slow down.

Please be careful, or come and claim your opinion.

I can still get along with the above assumptions although I have the question then does the wave's energy stop? Maybe she keeps changing places only? Do we enter mysticism ie the power of qi and god? Because that's where I've been and I have no problem with the subject and I have no problem connecting mysticism and science together (to me it's perfectly clear)

So let's focus your observation (my observation is no less than a space) and please explain to me what you think I should weigh to help me understand.

In conclusion :

Energy diffuses and distances itself from the source through medium.

Now, what happens to the medium in which energy passes? After all, what reaction is there, what is the same reaction and whether the essence of this reaction is the creation of something new or just the transfer and / or transformation of that energy (please let's not put the temperature of the material at the moment)Published at: 29.05.2009 at 18: 58: 22


I have to go out and I'll be back later - thank you for now
Link to content
Share on other sites

You probably reduced what you imagined to a one-dimensional line "between two points." That's not what I meant.

You need to visualize any boundaries in the virtual bubble that is incidental, three-dimensional.

The minimum you need to play with in mind is two-dimensional space and above.

Hegel's source is somewhere between these two boundaries. (Where? What do I care, that's your imagination)

I do not go into mysticism, not that I cancel it, just do not get into it right now. Your luggage is in place.

Energy does indeed change position and quantity given to a unit of space (as it dissipates, there is less of it in the next phase and no less than itself.) No more. She does not stop.

It is simply passed on. It's an endless process. It seems silly to Allah and will certainly bring me counter-examples, but those who stop to think and use their heads will discover discoveries.

Soon someone will jump up and say "Oh God" ... Fever.

If you do not see the principle, imagine two counts, one within the other. Start with some size and now expand both.

The content between the two sefirot can not change in terms of quantity but something else must change and still leave the same amount ... what?

As the wave passed somewhere between your two borders, something happened at the same point. What?

Great, we'll take the opportunity.

Link to content
Share on other sites

It does not slow down. It simply dissipates as the wave continues to move away from its source. And it does not. How wonderful and sucked from the finger it sounds.

Remember, we're currently talking about no voice Which is already another "little" story.

(Incidentally, there is also a process produced by Suno , A focused sound wave that does not dissolve)

Up to here, okay?

You're very misleading here, mixing 2 with completely different things: an acoustic wave and an electromagnetic wave.

Also in your recent messages, you are constantly confused between a wave in the middle and a wave of lightning (not to mention that a sound wave does not exist in a vacuum)

Link to content
Share on other sites

A sound wave can not exist in a vacuum because it is a mechanical wave (ie the wave is simply a movement of particles)

An electromagnetic wave is carried on photons and can therefore move in a vacuum, because the photons (which are particles in themselves)

They carry the wave

I do not know how much the question "Is light created or is it always there?" Because it does not really matter

Energy (and matter, which is a different expression to the same thing) always exists and simply changes its shape all the time

When you transfer an electric current in a filament, the energy changes into an electromagnetic wave and heat that the wire emits.

So you could say that the photons did not exist before, or perhaps photons lacked energy or you could say they existed

First simply in a different way (electric current)

Link to content
Share on other sites

So you could say that the photons did not exist before, or perhaps photons lacked energy or you could say they existed

First simply in a different way (electric current)

Lol ... I guess you mean something right but you write something really wrong ..

In this case there is no open question: the photons did not exist in the filament or anything else. As I have already written, the photon is simply a form of energy: we had energy in the form of an electric current that became an energy in the form of a wave of light (ie photons).

Of course there is no such life photon with zero energy, it just does not exist.

Link to content
Share on other sites

You're very misleading here, mixing 2 with completely different things: an acoustic wave and an electromagnetic wave.

Also in your recent messages, you are constantly confused between a wave in the middle and a wave of lightning (not to mention that a sound wave does not exist in a vacuum)

Cat, do not know what you are or you know in physics and how many rubbish they put into your head (do not offend) but there is no such thing as "empty"

You can argue with me until the end of the world and still there is no such thing. Do some research and I'll be happy to discuss this with you.

Pump all the gas out of any container (assuming it does not collapse into itself) Do you think you got empty? You received tax differences. no more.

The space left in the tank is a waste of time. We just do not have the tools to measure it right now.

I do not get confused. I started the matter with sound waves that are much easier to illustrate.

Electromagnetic waves are the same (ie principle) and it has been proven. The formal scientific establishment simply stuck in the past and thrusts the rest of the world.

(Like the Catholic Church and ...? Who was right at the end?)

Imagine Rick is "uncomfortable" for a start.

Link to content
Share on other sites

I do not get confused. I started the matter with sound waves that are much easier to illustrate.

Electromagnetic waves are the same (ie principle) and it has been proven. The formal scientific establishment simply stuck in the past and thrusts the rest of the world.

(Like the Catholic Church and ...? Who was right at the end?)

Imagine Rick is "uncomfortable" for a start.

You can ask based on what you base these things on?

I actually heard about an experiment in which there was no site.

Link to content
Share on other sites

: cool2:

Michelson and Morley's famous experiment is a joke. Again, no tools measure the void so no (especially in 1887) have found nothing.

Still, in 2009 there are no precise tools to measure the subject. There are very, very rough tools.

I base my claim on a healthy logic and follow a few thousand experiments in the field of optics, electricity, electronics, waves, gravity and space and much more.

As well as left and right proofs that the scientific establishment simply refuses to accept and becomes pseudo-physics.

To understand why I read a joke and why not, do you know the history of aviation or train?

On the train, for example, she claimed that if the cars approached the 40 kilometers per hour, the people in the cars would choke because they would not be able to breathe enough air.

There was an experiment like this, I do not remember where I read. Today there are trains that "fly" at 400 500 per hour.

In flight, she had argued for a long time that a body that was heavy with air, could not fly, and birds were a miracle from God, that was what kept them safe.

Thousands of experiments have been done and "proved" that the man would remain close to the ground until the Wright brothers came and turned the world to the other side.

Do you know wave theory?

Link to content
Share on other sites

Cat, do not know what you are or you know in physics and how many rubbish they put into your head (do not offend) but there is no such thing as "empty"

Let's start by being a physicist (Tel Aviv University) so I have not been bullied and I'm not a graduate of Wikipedia

I would love to hear your education on the subject (I have great doubt if she is in physics).

We will continue with the fact that you have never visited a serious laboratory in the field of physics. She would have understood that when you talk about vacuum, you talk in keruvim and in modern laboratories, you reach empty levels of a single number of atoms per cubic meter.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Walla ? Physicist ?? Respect !!! Does having a formal education (one way or another) make you an expert on the subject? What a beauty. You only prove what I wrote.

Did not they push you back? what are you saying ! Be wise to you who thought the same bull.

We will continue with the fact that you have never visited a serious laboratory in the field of physics. She would have understood that when you talk about vacuum, you talk in keruvim and in modern laboratories, you reach empty levels of a single number of atoms per cubic meter.

Tell me, do you describe empty as a lack of mass? Are you a clown? 99% of the volume of each atom is empty and the atomic distance (according to the standard definition)

So when you have a kilogram of lead in your hand (mass, not weight), what do you actually have?

Listen, you can change bites and you can talk on the forum (only if you have an open mind and you are not fixed)

what do you want ? Do you have an open mind?

devoid of mass DOES NOT mean devoid of energy, ether or any other unknoen medium which man did not discarded yet.

A question to me, an expensive physicist,

Is there a magnetic monopole?

Link to content
Share on other sites

: cool2:

Michelson and Morley's famous experiment is a joke. Again, no tools measure the void so no (especially in 1887) have found nothing.

Still, in 2009 there are no precise tools to measure the subject. There are very, very rough tools.

I base my claim on a healthy logic and follow a few thousand experiments in the field of optics, electricity, electronics, waves, gravity and space and much more.

As well as left and right proofs that the scientific establishment simply refuses to accept and becomes pseudo-physics.

To understand why I read a joke and why not, do you know the history of aviation or train?

On the train, for example, she claimed that if the cars approached the 40 kilometers per hour, the people in the cars would choke because they would not be able to breathe enough air.

There was an experiment like this, I do not remember where I read. Today there are trains that "fly" at 400 500 per hour.

In flight, she had argued for a long time that a body that was heavy with air, could not fly, and birds were a miracle from God, that was what kept them safe.

Thousands of experiments have been done and "proved" that the man would remain close to the ground until the Wright brothers came and turned the world to the other side.

Do you know wave theory?

Can you please share with us the common sense, and the evidence you are talking about?

Science today is not going as it used to be, so the examples you brought are irrelevant today. Once they sat in the room and thought that the heavier the body, the faster it falls - does this mean that the conclusions drawn from studies today are incorrect?

Link to content
Share on other sites

I argue (like many others, some of them from the scientific establishment itself) that many of today's conclusions and assumptions are based on many pieces of information and past shuffles

Which have become holy cows (a minimum of Torah from the Sinai) and no one is willing to touch. (Only the brazen and the boldest)

Imagine, one sun in the whole universe. Only one. There are no stars, no other windows. there's nothing.

By the way, the limits of the universe are something you can not explore so do not put them in here.

The sun has been shining on it for 15 a billion years and it has another 15 billion until it dies. (Hypothetical)

What do you have in such a universe?

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site