Who believes they landed on the moon? - Page 3 - Science and Technology - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

Who believes they landed on the moon?


chenrp

Recommended Posts

That's what scientists said

And there is also the explanation for lighting

You think the suit is good enough

And I know you know there's no pressure there with her

And you have to remember that at that time there was competition between the Russians and America

So if they were under pressure

Link to content
Share on other sites

  • תגובות 142
  • Opens on
  • Last comment

A. Why curse ?!

B. There is no atmosphere to the Moon and because of this there is very strong radiation. The Chinese returned from there as if they were in a baking oven ...

third. Idiot or truth, you will decide, but talk to the matter and stop to Messi.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Were on the moon, several times, and there are irrefutable proofs -

Moon-landing missions of Apollo that landed on the moon another name, with a landing base. You can not really see them with a home telescope, but you can identify the landing sites in the observatories.

- Point it first, putting the mirror on the moon, used to measure its distance and the rate of its distance from Earth. In the same chapter of Mythbusters did also use the same look, to show that it does exist.

Any argument by the conspirators who claim that there was no landing on the moon full of holes, or ignore simple facts (the flag is "hoisted"?

And something else, not really proof -

Even the Russian government, which was the rival of the United States in the same race , Accepted that the United States sent a man to the moon successfully, and did not make false claims about forgery.

In the matter of radiation, there is no radiation on the moon. There are fairly extreme temperatures, yes, but nothing that a multi-layered suit can handle.

For the viewing window in helmets, it is shielded from radiation by a gold foil.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Look at the movies

Of FOX's channel

The guy is right!

Search Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - Conspiracy Theory - We Were Land On The Moon .

I have done a lot of courses in physics (including nuclear, modern, quantum, etc.) and each of my professors (some represent the In competitions, some of them heads of physics at the Technion, etc.) say that they did not land on the moon at all!

it's all nonsense. There was no landing there, and if you see (although there is no translation but for those who do not understand English I offer to help other people) All movies (there is 5) of:

Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - Conspiracy Theory - Did We Land On The Moon

Site , You will understand.

Even an astronaut , Says himself that they did not land there! And those who tried to say this before the "landing" simply died in strange ways (15% of all astronauts were killed ...! Not strange !?).

Society, do not underestimate me. First, find out all the facts.

I investigated the matter thoroughly. I spoke with experts in image processing and physicists and more. Everyone says they have not landed.

Enjoy the movies:

Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - Conspiracy Theory - Did We Land On The Moon

Link to content
Share on other sites

Quantum mechanics, relativity and nuclear physics Ingredients The courses called "Modern Physics" and the Technion are called 3.

You quote the video that the guy you quoted gave a link to it!

Like you're serious !? That's your proof!

And what Brian O'Leary had said

I can not say 100% for sure whether these men walked on the moon. It is possible that could have covered it up, just in order to cut corners, and to be the first to allegedly go to the moon

Or in Hebrew subtitles "I want to be published in the film but I do not want to go out of the loop if they refute the arguments from the film, so I will say something without explicit meaning in one direction or another"

Link to content
Share on other sites

Friend,

I HAVE MADE PHYSICS 1 M, M 2 PHYSICS, AND M 3 PHYSICS. What is the connection?

I asked lecturers and heads of physics departments at the Technion and others.

I even asked a Russian astronaut (who in those years was an astronaut).

And yes, I say look at the movies. Look at all things together and then decide.

They said there was no 51 once ...

Just be aware that more than 20% of Americans do not believe they landed on the moon. And this is their country!

In short, I say then that you should extract information from all possible places before deciding.

Link to content
Share on other sites

The guy is right!

Search Documentary - Moon Landing Hoax - Conspiracy Theory - We Were Land On The Moon .

I have done a lot of physics courses (including nuclear, modern, quantum, etc.) and each of my lecturers (some of them representing Israel in competitions, some of them heads of physics at the Technion, etc.) say they did not land on the moon at all!

So the landing bases, the sights at a number of sites, and the flag still stuck there I suppose aliens were named.

In addition, the video is full of the same preposterous arguments that are always raised - "The shadow does not go in the right direction," "The flag flips," "Who filmed Neil Arsamartung going down if there was no one down there first," "How they saw Neil Armstrong lit if he was in the shade Of the Lunar Lander, "" It's not low gravity, they shot in slow motion. "

Mythbusters have gone through most of these things with an illustration that leaves little room for doubt, and it is only as a backing for a million and a quarter explanations, official and informal, detailing and detailing the nonsense of the conspirators.

Do not believe? Fly to one of the many observatories in the US, ask them to direct the telescope towards one of the landing sites, and send a signal .

circular? There's a mirror there. not returning? no name. Easier than that can not be.

Link to content
Share on other sites

More than 80% of Americans are idiots

If you are going to base your beliefs / opinions on the Americans, your situation is not brilliant.

With all due respect to the lecturershead (Singular) Department of Physics Are you going to go after all they say? Because chances are they will tell you that Toyota is the most reliable and most quiet source.

The connection is that you write things that show the lack of familiarity with the things you write about them.

You want to be convinced?

Call the Barkat Observatory, they have the option to make a live feed from the telescope over the Internet, ask to see the sites and see the bases of the land, the moon and so on?

Link to content
Share on other sites

The Americans did land people on the moon, those who do not believe just a little boy who is influenced by conspiracy theories.

With a telescope on the moon (with a telescope strong enough) you can see footsteps, and one of the astronauts left a picture of his family on the moon, and with a telescope strong enough you can see it too.

Link to content
Share on other sites

ארכיון

This discussion has been archived and new comments can not be added.


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site