New Windows operating system just around the corner. - Page 3 - Windows - HWzone Forums
adplus-dvertising
Skip to content
  • Create an account
  • About Us

    Hello Guest!

     
    Please note - in order to participate in our community, comment and open new discussions, you must join as a registered member.

    Our members enjoy many advantages, including the ability to participate in discussions, enjoy raffles and promotions for members of the site, and receive our weekly content directly by email.

    Do not like being harassed by email? You can register for the site but do not submit your registration to the weekly email updates.

New Windows operating system just around the corner.


A-10
 Share

Recommended Posts

And what's the point?

That is, Full of videos with comprehensive product reviews

Not yet officially announced (maybe water grinding and maybe not),

But you can probably see more from the picture you uploaded .....

 

I wonder what you wanted to say in addition.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Released (Edited)

Here's everything Microsoft has released so far -

 

https://www.microsoft.com/he-il/windows/windows-11-specifications

 

Minimum requirements and general requirements of the hardware,

When will the system be available as an upgrade and what will be removed and what will not be installed in the transition between 10 and 11

Or in a clean installation.

Edited By A-10
Link to content
Share on other sites

Quote of A-10

And what's the point?

That is, YouTube Full of videos with comprehensive product reviews

Not yet officially announced (maybe water grinding and maybe not),

But you can probably see more from the picture you uploaded .....

 

I wonder what you wanted to say in addition.

one picture is worth a thousand words. And people are looking to see differences between ten and the new system. In the picture you can see the rounded corners, the different start menu, and the new design language

Link to content
Share on other sites

It is important to note two hardware limitations.

The first, Support for processors Only the eighth generation of (Processors from the last three years) and largely from the third generation (excluding singles from the second generation) of the Raisins.

 

The second requirement is to have a TPM chip on the board (and it is also important to run on Because it is usually canceled) and it seems that there will also be an obligation to transfer the To Secure Boot mode.

 

On the face of it, without these requirements being met no upgrade will be offered automatically nor will it be possible to proactively install directly on the hardware (but yes it will be possible to install in a virtual machine).

 

I believe the processor will not really limit in the end because as far as we know there is no special command set that exists in new and not old processors or any other significant difference that will prevent the system from running even on a 10 year old processor and I have a hard time seeing Microsoft restrict installation on four and five year old processors Are a lot in the market because it will not serve its interests (although the option exists then have to wait and wait for the official beta versions), although it may be necessary to proactively install on 6th, 7th generation processors on the side of And on first- and second-generation travelers that no automatic upgrade option will be offered.

However, it seems that the requirement to chip in a TPM on the board (and do not think it really matters if version 1.2 or 2.0) may be a more significant limitation.

In laptops from recent years (I want to say 4 plus minus) this is less of a problem because most of them have a TPM chip (Microsoft required manufacturers who wanted to sell a computer that includes the Install chip). In motherboards for stationary the situation is more complex. Some boards only have a connector and you need to buy the appropriate chip separately, and some boards do not. Since the announcement, the prices of TPM chips have said that people are trying to make money from the panic that followed the announcement. From a few dozen shekels (10 to 70 NIS on average) the price jumped to a few hundred.

At the moment it seems better to wait closer to the launch date (but in the meantime find out for the best order in the motherboard booklet if there is a connector for a TPM chip on the board) and the weeks / months that follow to wait for things to clear up and make an informed decision.

For example: Because of the relative difficulty with supporting TPM chips that are still a niche even in the latest generation hardware, there may be a change in policy, such as requiring only Secure Boot, and in particular home versions of the system.

Edited By About: blank
Link to content
Share on other sites

Quote of About: blank

It is important to note two hardware limitations.

 

Hmmm

 

So not only is the system going in terms of appearance in this direction of ,

Microsoft also applies a policy of hardware like ?

Because Tends not to look after when she takes out new,

And anyone who wants it is committed to upgrading hardware accordingly.

Hopefully in the end this is not the case in Redmond, because with all due respect to the version

God - 10 and a quarter Of the windows announced on Thursday, I see no reason to go 

On the new version even without the hardware requirements.

 

Link to content
Share on other sites

Released (Edited)

In the meantime, there are all kinds of detours on the net for the restrictions mentioned above,

But since in my opinion there is really nothing to hurry with the new version,

Sees no point in discussing them.

Edited By A-10
Link to content
Share on other sites

I would say that the rabbi is still hidden from the visible.

The requirement for a TPM makes sense (an attempt to prevent the system from going up if malicious changes were made to the firmware and components outside the operating system itself; also contributes to disk encryption security) 7 at the same time quite draconian. Indeed a page from the book of .

There are some issues here in my opinion. First of all the echo niche support. Although the chip-level imaging chip mentioned by Moon-Mage (called fTPM in And PTT on the Intel side) is supported in my opinion on all of Intel's processors From the last decade (and probably the last five years) and the first generation of the Raisins, the possibility does not always exist in Because of matters of market segmentation. This is something that has been updated Can resolve but the question of whether the board manufacturers will release such an update. Probably for boards that are a few years to a few good years old.

I do not really have statistics on the percentage of boards in each generation that supports this in recent editions (starting from 6th and 7th editions of And first generation of Raisen).

 

TPM simulation in firmware is also not as secure as Dedicated, and there are applications for which it is not enough, but in my opinion Will not be so difficult and frankly it is also irrelevant to the average home or office user.

There is another problem with TPM. Strengthening system security through encryption keys and locking it to changes adds more failure points and more difficulties that the average user may encounter through no fault of their own. Especially those who deal with a little more exotic things like Dual Boot or will try to install another system that has no voltage for Secure Boot. There is a reason why by default on most boards / laptops (if any) Or firmware simulation) This option is disabled.

There may eventually be ways to install TPMs as well, along with warnings that the system is "not secure", but at the moment it is factually impossible to install the leaked version without TPM and Secure Boot mode.

Need to wait for more mature versions.

 

The processors in my opinion will not really limit, but Can impose an artificial limitation. Ochi is more of a warning to spur board manufacturers to include it as a standard so that by 2025 there will be no systems on the market without it. But all guesses at the moment. 

One has to wait for more mature versions.

 

It would be quite ironic even if in a time of global shortage of chips leading to price increases and stock shortages, and given that the jump in processor performance over a 4-5 year period is not so significant that their power is still in the hips of even "old" systems, Microsoft will decide it is timing It is good to apply these restrictions. Actually not ironic at all. Will continue the pattern of one good system, followed by a problematic system problem with lots of birth cords.

 

Link to content
Share on other sites

tpm does not require disk encryption, it is just one of its convenient applications. It can also be used to prevent the use of MIMIKATZ or such and such variations.

 

If indeed drive encryption becomes the default this will be a way for Microsoft to forcefully push the "Microsoft account" because this will be the only way to release a locked computer.

Link to content
Share on other sites

Join the discussion

You can then join the discussion and then join our community. If you already have an account with us, please Log in now To comment under your username.
Note that: The comment will appear to the surfers after approval by the board management team.

guest
Add a comment

×   The content pasted is with formatting.   Remove formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically assimilated.   Show as regular link

×   Your previous content has been automatically restored.   Clear all

×   You can not paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • Latest news

  • Buzz-Zone: Everything hot on the net

  • Popular now

×
  • Create new ...

At the top of the news:

new on the site