Computex was just the trailer: AMD is demonstrating performance tests for its new processors, HWzone
ComputersProcessorsFeatured articles

Computex was just the trailer: AMD is showing performance tests for its new processors

Next Horizon Gaming Event B- Brings more details about the performance of the 3000 that will reach the shelves next month

The new series of processors at the gateway and it is time to get more information about the processing monsters of the To the resident Which will be launched this summer.

These stars were announced at Computex earlier and are expected to dominate the world of productivity and gaming. Of course the price comes below that of existing products Parallels with 3900X that first brings an 12 processor cores to a completely standard chassis.

On stage she presented The performance tests it has done for all its new processors, and it is worth taking this as a limited liability. We will of course provide independent testing when the products are available. In the 500 category, the rate at which the Intel Core i9 9900K currently dominates, similar gaming performance was seen between Intel with Intel 9 3900X Has 2 cores. The differences are not particularly large according to these graphs.

The Ryzen 7 3800X is a processor with 8 cores competing directly in the 400 category against the Core i7 9700K. Here, too, bad gaming performance was observed in my lab When the exception is the Overwatch with performance that stay slightly low on the side of As in previous generations in comparison.

The Ryzen 5 3600X is the next hexagonal cores processor to occupy the middle market with a price tag of 250 dollars directly in front of the Core i5 9600K. Here we see a little more positive competition to the side Compared. Definitely looks promising!

More details will be revealed during the month of July with the launch of these processors. Of course, we normally recommend waiting for independent tests to make the right purchase. There are other details that we know that many of you want to know about these processors like productivity tests and other vegetables.

Tags

16 תגובות

  1. I'm missing 16 cores :-).
    By the way, say hello to the new PBO / XFR who are now also boosting the maximum frequency, up to 200MHZ extra!
    I will be hello to the performance crown at Intel ST.

  2. This ?
    Same performance at the same price?
    So what did they do with it?
    Where is the second generation revolution?
    It's like AMD say here,
    We can as well as Intel,
    Be greedy ……

  3. What greed? Do you offer 1600 $ processor performance at 750 $ cost half of power or 1200 $ processor at 499 $ and so on?
    And if they start the PBO, then Intel's ST performance will go away (we'll wait for the tests).

  4. napoleon45 lives in a simple movie, ignore it, a little boy who does not understand economics, development and even what revolution is - access the dictionary.
    What revolution exactly? What are you talking about?
    Do you get processors that cost more than 3 on Intel including their motherboards because they have to go up in the category and you complain?
    Yes, you can't give you 50% generation by generation because within 2 generations there's nothing to offer = economics, something you don't understand.
    In addition, the PCI-E 4 is not useful for those who need or really want and much more.

    Basically, you get lots of cores for nothing.

  5. Quote of TheHwGeek

    What greedy?

    I'm talking about processors for up to 500 dollars,

    As it appears in the article itself.

    Each AMD processor competing with its own

    (In terms of price) from Intel.

    So 3900 gives (on its face) the same performance as 9900

    And at the same cost, and so did the processors underneath, each

    In its price segment.

    And that's what I was asking about, so what's the news here?

    If you market your 3900 one hundred / fifty

    Less dollars, filled up….

    About 16 and half price and other vegetables,

    It's too early to know and talk. will see …..

  6. Are you talking about similar performance in terms of gaming? If so then it is not quite right to compare this way because if only games are interesting then the simple 3600 at 199 $ with the new PBO will already give you 9700K / 9900K performance depending on the exploits of the game's cores.

    AMD had only the frequency and ST, they closed the gap and therefore the cheap model will also provide you, so the VFM is much larger than you would like.

  7. Quote of napoleon45

    I'm talking about Processors Up to 500 dollars,

    As it appears in the article itself.

    Any processor of AMD Who competes with his counterpart

    (In terms of price) of Intel.

    So 3900 gives Performence (On his face) like that of 9900

    And at the same cost, and so did the processors underneath, each

    In its price segment.

    And that I asked about? So what is the news here?

    If you market your 3900 one hundred / fifty

    Less dollars, filled up….

    About 16 and half price and other vegetables,

    It's too early to know and talk. will see …..

    You get a processor with 50% more cores at the same price not to mention all the security breaches that Intel processors have.

  8. Also, the above presentations are without Microsoft's latest update which improves up to 15% in some games with RYZEN, so there is another improvement as seen and seen in the reviews.

  9. Quote of TheHwGeek

    You 're talking about Performence Similar in terms of games?

    You know, but in the meantime, that's what was said in the article above. :)

    Feel free to read again -

    "In the $ 500 category that Intel's Core i9 9900K now controls, similar gaming performance was observed between AMD Intel with IntelRYZEN 9 3900X has 2 cores. The differences are not very large according to these graphs. "

    "The Ryzen 7 3800X is an 8-core processor that competes directly in the $ 400 category against the Core i7 9700K"

    Etc. etc'

  10. Quote of zumara

    You get a processor with 50% more cores at the same price not to mention any security breaches that there are in the processors Intel.

    There is also a security breach in AMD processors.

  11. Such as those at Intel, not the last ones (perhaps also)

    But the first ones, Maltada and the other vegetables.

    Just about Intel made more noise….

Leave a Reply

Back to top button
Close
Close