We already know With almost absolute certainty That a pair of processors from the new generation of Intel Will be launched on 5 in August As replacements To the Devil's Canyon workers The successful ones launched a year and a half ago. All we have left now is to wait patiently and wonder about the improved capabilities and performance that might be waiting for us Intel. A seemingly authentic first review from a site called techbang.com purports to provide us with the answers we're looking for right now.
The Chinese site criticized the chip maker's new flagship processor (and then downgraded - perhaps due to Intel or other official requirements, and perhaps simply because it was inaccurate or incorrect), suggesting that Core i7-6700K Quad-core versus Core i7-4790K The core quadrant comes mainly from its more advanced built-in graphics core.
As part of PCMark, Cinebench, 3DMark and Sandra, PC processor benchmark tests The Skylake Introduced improvements ranging from single percentages to 29 percentages - although the biggest improvements came, as mentioned, in multimedia and graphical tests that were most significantly affected by the new graphical kernel, which would quite clearly be 20 to 30 percent more powerful than the processor's The corresponding Haswell (thanks to 48 execution units incore i7-6700K, as opposed to 20 units onlycore i7-4790K).
Disappointingly, in a number of tests seemingly performed independently of the graphical core, but based on the same dedicated video card - thecore i7-4790K actually managed to provide a result that is slightly better than that of thecore i7-6700K, even though both models operate at identical frequencies and with the same thermal envelope.
It should be noted that the processor tested in the audit is an Engineering Sample, when in past generations we had the opportunity to see quite a few leaks that were based on similarly classified models and offered characteristics and performance that proved to be inaccurate in retrospect - therefore, not to be seen here in the official launch class Performence A little more worthy of the new generation.
The Claymore Z170 board of the company ECS, Which was used to carry out the said audit
However, the general feeling is that also In the era of the sixth Core We will see most of the technological improvement that comes from the transition to production in 14 nanometer lithography is 'invested' and aimed at the built-in graphics core,core The expensive and advanced i7-6700K will not use the same HD Graphics core that will in any case be a bottleneck for the performance potential of the general processing cores. Have we really reached the limit on CPU cores, and now the only option is to start increasing the number of cores?
Is it possible to begin to be upset or is there still hope? You are welcome to begin sharing your speculations and assessments here with comments.