More volume, less money: The Sandisk Ultra II drive in HWzone Review
ComputersstorageReviewsFeatured articles

More volume, less money: The Sandisk Ultra II Sandisk Ultra II drive

The Sandisk Ultra II is Offering respectable volumes for a relatively low price tag. How does he do it, and how does he work?

Get updates from everyone in TelgramGet updates from us all at TelgramJoin the channel now

Remember the dark but beautiful days where the drives are Started to pop into the market? Not only did we not dream of volumes passing through the 240 gigabytes, but they were a luxury. For a 64 gigabyte drive that was considered at that time a standard one, we had to pay an amount closer to four digits. For 80 and 128 gigabytes, beyond that, and for 240 gigabytes… well, I'll let you remember alone.

If you remember these days, you must remember the hope that someday there will be days when we can pay a normal sum of money for a decent storage space in the market.. Well, my friend, those days are here. Despite the technologies being built to multiply these volumes for the price, such as 3D technology , We are still far from the volumes offered in the hard drive market, certainly from the value against the money.

So until the market turns upside down, there are existing technologies, such as TLC NAND, But the price is still less popular for the volume of the example 240 Gigabyte. But Samsung is not the only one in the market: I want to introduce you to the Sandisk Ultra II, a drive You're likely to choose immediately if you search for volume High in low budget.

God- Ultra II

Family Of SanDisk is divided into the Extreme Pro models, Plus, as well as the Ultra II, which is in a good place in the middle, and as mentioned, built with TLC technology, a technology that allows more A little more money for extra Of bits for each cell.

TLC technology - more bits per cell
TLC technology - more bits in each cell

The 240 gigabyte, the controlled model, is sold in the country at an average price of about NIS 450 - almost half the price available for such volume. Other models are the 128, 480 and 960 gigabytes, which are sold at average prices of About 300, 800, and 2000. But I think it is appropriate to focus on the attractive price of the 240 Gigabyte.

Also, there is another aspect: While the 240 GB version is currently controlled, along with the 128 GB version, 88SS9190, the latest versions use a slightly different Marvell 88SS9189 controller with higher IOPS data. But again, let's focus on ours: The above controller version offers read and write speeds of about 550 and 500 megabytes per second respectively. Random read and write data stands for 91K and 83K IOPS respectively.

The interesting point is that the Ultra II is not branded as a "bottom market product", but should also offer Respectable enough. This branding is pretentious, so the question being asked is where it is compared to the larger models - in other words, it is cheap and rich, but how fast is it?


At a glance

The drive came to us in a fairly standard package. Of course we do not ask for more than that.


The contents are also very standard: instructions booklet, paperwork, himself. You will not find anything special, except perhaps a frame that is supposed to wrap the drive for computers Which previously used a thicker version of the 2.5 drive, for example this is useful.


The Sandisk Ultra II is The standard size 2.5 "has a nice SATA 6GB \ s interface with a nice finish, but it's definitely the drive The lightest weight I have ever held, since it is made of plastic and feels plastic.


drive Although lightweight and standard, it feels cheap, but first, it is blessed with computers , Where weight plays a major role, and secondly, in our case, illustrates the TLC technology and demonstrates a minimalist and intelligent design under the hood.

We won't know how the drive works in real time if we keep looking at it. So we will take it now for review and come back with conclusions - a full-fledged solution, or At its best?

Ultra-II test

We will divide the tests for the A couple of categories: Synthetic tests - tests "on paper", where test software is used, and reality tests - the way the drive actually responds to frequent work. The following is the system specification on which the above drive was tested:

Processor: Intel G630 3.0Ghz
Motherboard: P67A-GD65 B3
Memory: Hynix 8GB (2x4GB) 1333Mhz
Graphics Card: HIS HD6790
Power Supply: Neo Eco 620W 80 Plus Modular

Let's start with the first synthetic test made using the CrystalDiskMark software, which will examine the speed of the drive and random write and read.


As can be seen from the synthetic tests, where the differences are not large, the Ultra II drive displays excellent reading and writing data relative to its price level, whether fixed or random.

Comparison point: When comparing the data from the software to the spiritual brother, the Samsung 850 EVO, the results are quite the same, with a slight to moderate advantage in the direction of Samsung in the other areas except for the random writing area, where surprisingly the Ultra II shows an advantage.

But when the comparison is against a player with the same price tag, BX100, the Ultra II has a very significant advantage in all categories, from fast reading and writing to much higher data Random numbers with high numbers.

Ultra II in reality tests

Numbers and points are important, but we will not get a real idea of ​​the performance of the drive until we test it in reality tests that reflect daily work. Let's start with the Boot Test 10 - This time is measured from the end of the POST process to a state where the operating system is ready for work.


A period of 15 seconds for the boot process is quite short and turns any fire or restart to pleasure. On average hard disk the loading process is about one minute. In the next test we will copy two types of files: a single BluRay movie file and a full file folder.


Comparison point: Let us briefly compare these times to those obtained from a hard drive type Barracuda 1TB Average: The copy time for the movie file is 3.42 minutes, and 4.25 minutes for the game folder.

In the next and final test, we will do another very common test that can sometimes determine the feasibility of purchasing a drive For some users, and this is a load time between different game stages.


13 seconds - this is the total amount of time you will have to wait for a phase load in one of the games where the load times are considered high. This is compared to about 38 seconds on the hard drive.

drive To the masses

Based on the findings and the price, where will we place Sandisk's Ultra II drive? In terms of performance, when you look at the reality tests, the Ultra II doesn't shame the data I've encountered on more "monstrous" drives, and the paper alone provides the same performance that might give them the greatest performance, the 850 EVO's . As for constant read and write speeds, the above drive certainly seems to be exhausting the capabilities of the SATA 6GB / s interface.

Ultra II - Why pay more for the same thing?

We'll add the price to the equation, and here's the clear conclusion: when a drive's price is the cheapest, and perhaps the cheapest in some places, and this drive provides reasonable performance - it's always worth buying for me as a budget option. The thing is, the Ultra II brings a much more welcoming performance table and the price remains terribly low - so I would highly recommend it, and associate it with the drive category. Best value for money.

Sandisk Ultra II 240GB - Recommended

Back to top button