Once and for all: Are Apple's computers really suitable for graphics? • HWzone
ComputersOperating SystemsFeatured articles

Once and for all: Are Apple's computers really suitable for graphics?

The debate between the Macs and the G- Has been going on for many years and will not end soon. So who is the most suitable computer for content creators, The new Pro changed something?

Get updates from everyone in TelgramGet updates from us all at TelgramJoin the channel now


As a graphics software teacher, I can attest that almost every course begs the question - Wouldn't it be better for anyone who went into the graphics world to buy a Mac? In that case, I ask the student why he thinks it's worth buying . His answer is usually because Mac is a computer that is more suitable for graphic artists. why? I ask him. And the answer - because every self-respecting graphic artist uses Mac. Why do self-respecting graphic artists use Mac? I make it difficult. And the answer: that It calculates graphics.

In the next article we will try to get out of this vicious circle and ask in what way, really, the Mac is better suited to the graphics. For the sake of graphic designers who are not involved in the hardware, we will try not to go into too high resolutions with the comparative details between the components of the system.

Imac
Imac - He is beautiful. There is no doubt.

Is Mac faster than PC?? probably not. When you set a standard budget for both competitors, the likelihood is that we will get a PC. Faster and more powerful. This is also accompanied by the option to upgrade hardware (such as a new graphics card) that is easier, simpler and cheaper than PC computers. Is Mac more stable than PC?? Well, there are no clear and unequivocal statistics, but it is clear that the operating systems of Windows 7 and above are very stable, as are the graphics programs they run. Is Mac more beautiful than PC? An important argument for designers who advocate aesthetics. Many screens and packages are designed for PC. In different degrees of prestige, and there is no preference for Mac's unique design, but there is nothing to argue about taste and smell. We have also recently introduced theSurface Studio Which features impressive design and an original, easy-to-use interface for graphic artists. It is important to note that the aesthetic advantage and convenience of working on a new Microsoft computer comes with a very high price tag on their side. Is Mac safer to work from PC? Mac probably has fewer viruses, but it's still dead For security problems, sometimes very serious. Anyway - the security question is relatively low when choosing a computer for a graphic artist.

Surface Pro - An innovative design and workflow for Microsoft graphics
Dial - Design and innovative way of working for Microsoft graphic designers

For the above considerations, it is also important to add the dimension of the Israeli mac market. Mac prices here are relatively high in the US and the availability of hardware is problematic. Entering the online store from the official importer idigital presents an option to buy an Imac computer with 2TB, I7 processor, and 8Gb memory at a price of much more than 14 thousand. At this price you can buy a PC. Dreamy with a large quality screen and much higher performance.

Macs have levels Higher and better suited to media people, especially in the field of video and 3D editing. As of this writing, they are out of stock in the iDigital store. So does the MacBook Pro laptop which is not available on the official importer website. Beyond the high price - the unavailability is also a point that indicates the problems with buying computers To media professionals in the Israeli market. The same applies to maintenance - the availability of computer repair labs Israel is much lower than physical computers. In some cases it is necessary to send a computer abroad to perform the repair and order replacement.

Idigital screenshot
IDigital screenshot
Mac Pro
MacBook Pro
Not in stock

From the above lines, it turns out that beyond the trendy trend, there is no substantial advantage to my computer In front of PCs for designers and editors. If so - why do design colleges in Israel require students to invest their money on a Mac? It may be a fixation based on another era from twenty years ago. At that time there was a real advantage for computers In the graphics field. It is possible that the old teachers of today have become used to working with computers And the transition to the PC world. Requires changes in their work habits. This is also the case with existing hardware in design schools, which traditionally operate on Mac computers: the transition to PC. Will be expensive and difficult. A new generation of graphic artists is once again being educated on the Mac without any substantive technical reason.

While it was possible to sign this article with the clear conclusion that there is no advantage for Mac computers to the graphic artists - it is important to stop and moment and examine the new launch of the computer -MacBook Pro A few days ago. The function buttons on the new laptop replaced a narrow touch screen on the keyboard, which contains buttons specific to the software that the computer is running. This screen allows graphic designers and editors Greater workability with smart keyboard shortcuts. This new feature on Mac laptops can be a new breakthrough and more convenient way for designers and editors , Especially for newcomers who still have difficulty finding keyboard shortcuts that are so essential. This is also the result of the large and sensitive touch pad of the new laptop. If the use of pressure intensity in graphic software is incorporated, it may have an added advantage over using a PC. .

Touch pad - The slim touch screen at the top of the keyboard will be used for shortcuts in graphics and video editing software
Touch bar - The thin touchscreen at the top of the keyboard will be used for graphics and video editing shortcuts

It's important to note that beyond Touch Bar - the new Mac does not present another significant benefit that might be a wink to the graphic artists. For example, the MacBook Pro 13-inch video card is Intel Iris Graphics 550. A built-in card that does not compare to advanced and powerful video cards from companies like AMD and Nvidia when it comes to applications for 3D users and video editors. The new launch has also created a mirroring among some of the designer community. On the site Charged It said Apple seems to have forgotten the media makers as the target audience for the new mobile. It is not clear what they complain about because the MacBook Pro has not shown material advantages over the past few years Others at the same price.

In the meantime, the Touch Bar technology was introduced only to the MacBook Pro laptop. A graphic artist who works in a studio will often prefer a desktop computer for work, because of the higher performance it will provide with a laptop in a similar budget, and mainly because of the need for a more powerful video card. If you continue The trend and the touch bar will also be applied to the desktops of her stationary computers, which may help them to be called - perhaps a little more justly - "computers for graphic artists."

https://youtu.be/oeSVFjFHnSg?t=2h24m24s


Tags

68 תגובות

  1. Finally say what I always thought!
    It's just delusional just like buying an iPhone, thinking it's "the best there is"
    Mac's success with the graphic artists is mainly because of the quality screen they would come up with
    And most people don't realize that a PC with a similar or even higher quality screen will provide a better answer.

  2. The way I see this is the real need for the Mac is for web people who also design websites. Today, it seems that Unix systems are more suitable for web builders because they allow easy working with all platforms. The problem in the Unix world The only environment that is suitable for web designers is the Mac environment. Let's face the fact that GIMP can not compete with all the existing offerings in the Mac and Windus, so they stay with Mac, as the only UNIX environment that fully supports builders and designers.

  3. The way I see this is the real need for the Mac is for web people who also design websites. Today, it seems that Unix systems are more suitable for web builders because they allow easy working with all platforms. The problem in the Unix world The only environment that is suitable for web designers is the Mac environment. Let's face the fact that GIMP can not compete with all the existing offerings in the Mac and Windus, so they stay with Mac, as the only UNIX environment that fully supports builders and designers.

  4. If people are really interested in running the operating system, there is always the Hackintosh that most Macs with half the price of the Mac have about three times the rendering and editing performance, and so on.
    Less viruses? Have you heard of Linux? Highly recommend (both on the same basis as Unix).
    The touchbar is a gimmick in my opinion. And touchscreens have been around for years (I have an HP TX2000 HP AMD DUAL CORE laptop with touch screen and also came with a pen designed for things like painting [which is not a windows run but Linux works great]).
    Another point about the "Pro" bottle is the fact that Xumomi Laptop is almost identical in terms of design and construction that comes with the same i5 processor and also the 940MX video card which I am sure will give a lot more benefit to all professional graphics and comes in at about $ 750. And yes, it can probably be installed on the Macintosh so it also comes out much better than the "Pro" bottle. And pro queries because no professional should choose a computer with such weak hardware at that price.

  5. The Mac Pro is outdated and has not been updated for two years. The media people aren't sure how relevant it is either. The dignity of the various founders in their place lies, but at any price level you can find a stronger PC configuration. Either way, the State of Israel is a price difference that makes the Mac completely unnecessary unless there is a specific need for it.

  6. The Mac, was the first computer to enable computer graphics, because it was the first computer, which had a mouse and a graphical user interface. Graphic editing software that came out Macintosh came much late to the PCs, which at that time could only display 4 colors and a text interface. Mac's demand for graphic artists and desktop publishing was true in the mid-80 and 90 years, when PC had no graphics editing software. Nowadays the choice of mac graphic artists is traditionally. There is no reason not to use a standard PC for this purpose. Read the "Macintosh" entry on Wikipedia.

  7. MACBOOK PRO and MAC PRO have a simplicity advantage over PC for layman graphics.
    It may sound puzzling to you, but MAC PRO has a quality screen by default… and so people who do not understand computers may be wrong and think there is no such option in PC.
    My DELL screen even has a different GAMMA for MAC for some reason.

    Anyway I argued it is like that ... If you are a simple user (and probably a layman), with no understanding WHAT SO EVER, you might think that MAC is better at graphics because of the quality screen standard.
    In the PC the diversity is so wide - that the layman graphic artist may buy a clearly unmatched screen and think his problem is that it is a PC and not a Mac.
    I suppose the same thing applies to buying a computer - MAC PRO has a "standard" that surpasses the simplest computers, which may again confuse the layman.

    Beyond that - I have yet to find a reason to order a MAC for work… and instead every time I can order an outgoing computer that I order a PC… .I am still looking for the reason to order a MAC with a reason to spend my time studying the system.
    And my hobby is photography - and I still haven't found an advantage in photography.
    And I haven't found an edge in my field at work (NETWORKING)

  8. There is one mistake in the article, the macBook pro that comes with an Intel graphics card, it is only in the 13 inch configuration. In the 15 inch version, there is a Radeon Pro 450 \ 455 graphics card with 2GB memory.

  9. Real content creators don't work on a laptop, certainly not a pro bottle. It might be appropriate for vulgariotobiovers of cabaret bands that don't really create complex content. Laptops have slow processors at least 30% of the same model on a desktop computer. The Ram is much slower. SSDs are even slower usually. The GPU is much weaker. There is no difference in the world of content creation between Mac and a Windows PC. Anyone who says otherwise, just FANBOY. This net trend in the art and apple world was a must for all coffee makers. At some point, some DJs justified Mac because it is really more stable in "Manny Time" (which is very important for DJs) and in Windows there is sometimes a BSOD created not because of Microsoft's lack of planning but because of the hardware makers.

  10. And without a single word about the difference between Mac and Windows (or Linux), you might want to think about a different career.

  11. As a person who works daily on Mac Pro ("from the ash"), and also on a PC.
    One thing I have to say ... "Suckers are not dead, they just take turns" as well as I was one of those who fell into Apple's bin.
    Mac OS X has memory leakage issues, console-level multi-tasking, app crashes for no reason.
    Video card drivers that haven't been updated in years ... want proof! Please all my day with Apter starts with the message that appears in the attached image.
    Good to have a PC around.
    [IMG] http://i63.tinypic.com/21d3n15.png [/ IMG]

    1. Wow, you came out what pita is. 1. You have an option to stop this message from coming back (at the bottom of the message). 2. This feature needs an Nvidia card and Mac has AMD. That's why the announcement.
      And for the rest of the discussion, there is no doubt that Mac hardware has no particular advantage (except that the operating system is specifically written to work with and it has some kind of advantage in hardware utilization and stability), but the operating system has a huge advantage in comfort, ease of use and even beauty (yes, it's a parameter) . Hi Pave to all kinds of Hackintushers.

      1. Smartmaker… Adobe also works with Open CL
        Check your knowledge for next time, before you throw nonsense into the air.
        Apple hasn't updated the firepro drivers for nearly two and a half years.
        That's why I uploaded the image, I just don't have GPU support on a computer that costs over NIS X,000.

  12. Maybe Mack's computers are excellent but at their price I buy a monstrous computer.
    In addition, the Surface Studio looks very promising.

  13. Most Mac users do not create any content and neither do graphic artists.
    It's a laptop designed for American idiots who surf through Facebook on Starbucks.
    And yes I have an Air Bottle, except for browsing the internet I do not tolerate it.

  14. Tradition from the past. In the 1990s Adobe only produced software (known as Photoshop) for Mac, which then included a personal laser printer, the first of its kind (from the first MacNUMX Mac).

    Beyond that, graphics standards have always been higher in Mac - higher quality screens and aesthetic interface (which is still better than windows). Things have changed since then, but the Bezalel School still recommends that students buy mac…

    1. These are exactly standards…?
      Apple screens are panels purchased from LG.
      From a real aesthetic interface, try working on Mac with 500 "fonts" fonts without any third party software.

  15. Search my comments from the last weeks !!!
    I counted exactly how I checked !!!!
    Thousands of dollars toss on the MAC… ..
    Sickening waste !!!!
    But from what I have seen, these are people who have and do not understand the hardware or software on the cruise!
    It's like putting (then in the Stone Age) a man who writes in BASIC against a man who deals in KOALA PAINTER!

  16. I don't really understand design software but according to what our designers at work say (and some of them have Macs, not all of them) is that the only reason is that some of the software doesn't exist in the Windows environment. Beyond that, they are fully aware of the fact that you can get a computer a lot more powerful (which translates into a significant cut in rendering times) at a lower price but there is not too much choice because of some of the customers' requirements.

    1. Exactly the opposite, in a highly programmable Mac from Autodesk.
      One of them is important in the industry 3DS MAX

  17. Well, just like the iPhone - there is nothing special about it other than the "Choponi" - I have a dark device at the Overprice seller. I personally do graphics and design and work at the same time according to Si and Mac, if it was up to me I wouldn't get close to Mac, not even for a second. He has no advantage over the PC

  18. Quote of jackhammer

    clown.

    What is connected to iPhone now ???

    Overpries device ?? Remind me how much it costs Galaxy 7?

    Stop talking bullshit already ...

    There is unequivocal evidence that a physical computer presents Performence Much higher than a Mac computer at the same price. And that I say Performence I do not mean a synthetic test but a rendition performance with much lower times. Which is actually what matters to people.

    Am I a clown? How much does another Samsung device cost? How much does HTC cost? How Many Million and One Other Devices Are Non-iPhone? Exactly the same as the computers - you have Apple, at excessive prices with no proportion and you have a PC that you can buy / assemble in NIS 1000 and you can if you want to buy a computer at double and triple the price of Apple. You have B-H-R-H.

    With Apple you have no choice. There's what's there and that's it. This is how the Mac is, this is the iPhone and that's all they take out. Did you understand the connection, dumb, between the iPhone and Mac? Did you understand the comparison, dumb?

  19. GUY The lack of selection in APPLE is exactly what the layman user likes.

    He does not have to investigate, no need to ask, no need to check.

    He knows if it is "good" or less "good" by the date for example "MID 2015" ... Show me a layman who can tell you you have a good PC that is MID 2015?

    They are high priced because they can, and that there are users and layman.

    The question of whether there is justification, not performance, in terms of operating system… As an example - all games go to PC, few go to Mac.

  20. Quote of Guy F

    Am I a clown? How much does another Samsung handset cost? How much does HTC cost? How much are a million and one other devices that are not an iPhone? Just the same as the computers - you have Dark, At disproportionately overpriced prices and you have a PC that you can buy / put on a NIS 1000 and you can if you want to buy a computer at a double price and triple that of Dark. You have a b-h-x-g-eh.

    עם Dark You have no choice. There is what there is. That's the way the Mac is, so it's the iPhone and that's how it's all they spend. Did you understand the connection, dummy, between the iPhone and the Mac? You understand the comparison, dummy?

    Once again you compare what happens in the iPhone-Android War to what happens in the PC-Mac War….

    It is not the same and there are no such phenomena.

    But because I probably did not explain myself clearly, I'll try again.

    How much does the iPhone 7 cost?

    https://www.google.co.il/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=iphone+7+price

    How much does the Galaxy 7 cost?

    https://www.google.co.il/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=galaxy+s7+price

    Um… .. Correct me if I’m wrong but the Galaxy is more expensive….

    So you'll probably say that his hardware is more powerful with more gigahertz and more ram? Absolutely right. And what exactly does it give you?

    Games run smoothly on the iPhone, the other apps work just as smoothly as on the Galaxy 7. So where exactly does the benefit of 8GB Ram and processor with the Gigafish Talafs come from?

    On the other hand, on a completely different subject we have a physical anti-mac.

    Mac's hardware is also inferior to the hardware of the physical (at the same price level) but here you can see the difference in performance.

    Again, I'm not interested in synthetic tests but tests of rendition. Tests for compressing and extracting RAR files. Such things can be seen saving time.

    So in the Mac-PC case, I agree there's no reason to buy Mac (except for very specific requirements).

    But the case of iPhone-Android is really nothing like it. And if you want to continue to live in a movie that your galaxy is better for because it has more ram and a processor with more gigs then Walla has it round you.

  21. Quote of jackhammer

    Again you compare what is happening in the iPhone-Android And what's going on in the Physic-Mac War….

    It is not the same and there are no such phenomena.

    But because I probably did not explain myself clearly, I'll try again.

    how much does it cost iPhone 7?

    https://www.google.co.il/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=iphone+7+price

    how much does it cost Galaxy 7?

    https://www.google.co.il/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=galaxy+s7+price

    Um… .. Correct me if I’m wrong but the Galaxy is more expensive….

    So you'll probably say that his hardware is more powerful with more gigahertz and more ram? Absolutely right. And what exactly does it give you?

    Games run smoothly on iPhone, The rest of the applications work seamlessly just like in the 7 Galaxy. So where exactly is the advantage of the 8GB RAM and processor with the gigabyte thalafis?

    On the other hand, on a completely different subject we have a physical anti-mac.

    Mac's hardware is also inferior to the hardware of the physical (at the same price level) but here you can see the difference in performance.

    Again, I'm not interested in synthetic tests but tests of rendition. Tests for compressing and extracting RAR files. Such things can be seen saving time.

    So in the Mac-PC case, I agree there's no reason to buy Mac (except for very specific requirements).

    But the case of iPhoneAndroid Absolutely not alike. And if you want to continue living in a movie that your Galaxy is better because it has more ram and a processor with more gigahertz then Walla is great for you.

    And before you make the argument that the iPhone is more limited than the Galaxy ... I'm with iPhone Already 6 years. There was not one single case I wanted to do something I could not. And I'm with JB.

    You continue along the same line and ignore the real comparison. Android has more choices besides the Galaxy 7 like PC has more choices besides the new Microsoft, whatever its name. Keep saying iPhone in front of Galaxy 7. I will continue to say that iPhone vs Android is equal to Mac vs PC
    Let's finish the discussion here, because there's no way forward.

  22. Quote of digitalseeker

    GUY The lack of selection in APPLE is exactly what the layman user likes.

    He does not have to investigate, no need to ask, no need to check.

    He knows if it's "good" or less "good" by the date for example "MID 2015" ... Show me a layman who can tell you you have PC Well that is MID 2015?

    They are high priced because they can, and that there are users and layman.

    The question is whether there is justification, not of Performence, In terms of Operating System… As an opposite example - all games go to PC, few go to Mac.

    That's exactly what I'm saying. What matters is that there is an apple eaten from the outside of the computer so that their calves know they have a Mac

    Few people I know really use Mac because they prefer it (especially the experience of use, not the performance test) on PC

  23. Quote of jackhammer

    Again you compare what is happening in the iPhone-Android And what's going on in the Physic-Mac War….

    It is not the same and there are no such phenomena.

    But because I probably did not explain myself clearly, I'll try again.

    how much does it cost iPhone 7?

    https://www.google.co.il/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=iphone+7+price

    how much does it cost Galaxy 7?

    https://www.google.co.il/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=galaxy+s7+price

    Um… .. Correct me if I’m wrong but the Galaxy is more expensive….

    So you'll probably say that his hardware is more powerful with more gigahertz and more ram? Absolutely right. And what exactly does it give you?

    Games run smoothly on iPhone, The rest of the applications work seamlessly just like in the 7 Galaxy. So where exactly is the advantage of the 8GB RAM and processor with the gigabyte thalafis?

    On the other hand, on a completely different subject we have a physical anti-mac.

    Mac's hardware is also inferior to the hardware of the physical (at the same price level) but here you can see the difference in performance.

    Again, I'm not interested in synthetic tests but tests of rendition. Tests for compressing and extracting RAR files. Such things can be seen saving time.

    So in the Mac-PC case, I agree there's no reason to buy Mac (except for very specific requirements).

    But the case of iPhoneAndroid Absolutely not alike. And if you want to continue living in a movie that your Galaxy is better because it has more ram and a processor with more gigahertz then Walla is great for you.

    And before you make the argument that the iPhone is more limited than the Galaxy ... I'm with iPhone Already 6 years. There was not one single case I wanted to do something I could not. And I'm with JB.

    And if you take oneplus 3 for example? Its price is about 2500 compared to the 7 iPhone in the 32GB version at the price of 3700 roughly and the hardware of the oneplus 3 is higher.

  24. Quote of Guy F

    You continue on the same line and ignore the real comparison. Android has another choice besides the Galaxy 7 as PC has more choice than the new Microsoft, whatever its name. Keep saying iPhone Galaxy vs 7. I'll keep saying iPhone vs. Android Equal to Mac vs. PC
    Let's finish the discussion here, because there's no way forward.

    I compare them to those 2 fish vessels on the market.

    Obviously there are more budget phones. But you can't compare a luxury car to a Honda Civic.

  25. Completely ignored is the 10-bit display theme and nearly 100% AdobeRGB display capability (not srgb). On Macs it exists. To get the 10 bit on your PC, you must purchase an expensive AMD video card from the expensive QUADRO series. (AMD deliberately disables this option on the cheaper tickets on drivers). Thus, in terms of price, this is a similar expense for a similar result.
    Another problem that exists in Windows systems is that each update comes as a PATCH, so over time the operating system gets slower, while MAC is rare.
    The different preoccupation with operating system updates and the variety of hardware and drivers can easily cause PC software crashes. On the Mac, since it is a uniform hardware, the problem does not exist at all.
    As for the operating system crash, I have computers with 7 windows, computers with 10 windows and MAC. There is nothing to compare the number of times the PCs crashed compared to the Macs.
    Another point, raised here, is the quality of the MAC PRO screens, which (perhaps) only exists on the expensive PC models.
    Your article seems to be directed at one direction, and one of the proofs of this is your disregard for the 15 "Mac PRO" computers, which have a dedicated graphics card, and are designed for graphic artists.

    Bottom line, graphic artists work with colors, they want the full spectrum, this is true on Macs, while a PC requires a Quadro card, you are welcome to see its cost.

    1. You claim
      - Millions of Macs are sold with Intel built-in video cards only at exorbitant prices
      In addition, only on 2015 OS support was added to 10 Bit
      - The update process is generally different in 10 windows (Komplitov update every month) We are not in XP
      - Mac also needs drivers for external devices just like windows
      -If your computers courses are just poorly maintained !!!
      MAC PRO This is a non-portable stationary computer

      1. 1. If millions have been sold, the price is probably not exorbitant
        2. I have a pro bottle before 2015, and have 10 bit support, which is not on PC laptops
        3. All my PCs got slow from update to update, it didn't happen in Mac, it didn't happen because of maintenance. This happened right after updates. Besides who has heard of maintenance. There is no such thing in the mac. This computer is not a vehicle, does not need 10000 care, I have not seen a maintenance recommendation in any manual that comes with the computer
        4. I meant a pro bottle and not a mac pro

        1. 1. Apple enthusiasts will also tell you the price is excessive
          2 Bit 10 support has only been added to OSX in 2015 (this is all true then your claim is ridiculous)
          10 Bit Windows support has been around for years and years
          And support is only for hardware + screen like IMAC 4K 5K only
          I advise you not to mislead people here

          3. If you don't install any garbage ... you don't need to maintain anything
          10 and 8 updates do not slow down especially with SSD
          Don't expect to take a slow 1500 PC with a slow hard drive and make a comparison to the 10 Plus PC

    1. True, but Photoshop, for example, does not support 10 bit in FirePro, only in Quadro. Quudero's prices, which provide adequate performance for graphic designers, cost thousands of shekels

  26. IDIGITAL Small Repair is not an official importer of these APPLE authorized resellers.

  27. Which I think for a long time. Apple is riding on what she's been good at before. This holds true for the iPhone as well as for the JAVA language and Apple's closed operating system (Microsoft has opened all its code to the general public! And can be developed in .NET for Android and Mac).

  28. Not that I think the buck is paying anyway, but that comparison is distorted.

    It is a three-year-old computer that, of course, can not cope with a modern computer.

    Apple's delusional pricing policy and price don't change as technology advances.

    Next month a new Mac Pro should be announced and it will have to be compared with a recent PC.

    Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

  29. Quote of omrij

    Not that I think the buck is paying anyway, but that comparison is distorted.

    It is a three-year-old computer that, of course, can not cope with a modern computer.

    Google 's pricing policy Dark The delirium and its price does not change as technology advances.

    The next month should be announced a new Mac Pro and will have to compare against PC up to date.

    Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

    Agree with you that its hardware is outdated because what to do (like you said), a 3 computer can't handle a modern computer…

    But that's what Apple sells. At the moment (or as of the time of the video's creation) this is the model that has to be darkened in the market.

    When the new Mac Pro arrives (emphasis on "could be") it will have the strongest hardware for a few months and then it will also be left behind ...

  30. "And yet, move ..."
    One of the most biased articles I have read in a long time.
    The comparison between Amime and any other PC is unrealistic since there is no computer with a screen like the Amime 27 '! And the comparison between Windows and MacOS is really unfair to Microsoft, which has to compromise every aspect of its operating system to fit the lowest common denominator, compared to Apple whose operating systems fit like a glove. Whether there are a few more Ghz's or not is not so relevant (of course in a logical sense) compared to the fact that the professional market needs reliable, stable tools, free from environmental threats, and ... fun for work. All this to reach the maximum level of creativity that every user aspires to.
    The writer is sinning to the truth, or trying in vain to disguise it by his "strange" reference to MacOS's much-favored stability compared to Windows, as well as its exceptional immunity to Mordmond's.

  31. I stopped taking hallucinogens because I felt that the imac with the unparalleled 27 screen in the world makes me supremely creative.

  32. Quote of David Peled

    "Still, moving." One of the most intrusive articles I've read in a long time. The comparison between AMIC and each computer PC Another is unrealistic because there is no computer on the market with a screen like the 27 "! And the comparison between Windows and MacOS is quite unfair to Microsoft, which has to compromise every aspect of its operating system to fit the lowest common denominator, Dark Whose operating systems fit like a glove nearby. If there are a few more Ghz s or not it is not so relevant (of course in a logical ratio) compared to the fact that the professional market needs Reliable, stable tools, free from environmental threats, and ... fun for work. All in order to achieve the maximum level of creativity that each user aspires to. The writer is wrong to the truth, or tries in vain to camouflage it by his "strange" attitude to MacOS's much superior stability compared to Windose, as well as to her extreme immunity to Redmond.

    Every Mac user's nightmare passes every day, or in short "sbbod"

    There are those who make fun, and some like me are busy biting their nails.

  33. Quote of omrij

    I've been using OSX for years (on PC)

    Can count on one hand the number of times I had a SBBOD

    This happens mostly in intensive work such as: Photoshop,

    After and Premier, individuated with a large number of columns.

    Networking vs. Servers.

  34. Quote of WarMachine

    The price increase did not upgrade the components in the basic model (13-inch), leaving us with the basic model with a poor Intel Iris memory card, 8 gigabyte RAM, and an i5 processor that is not the latest Intel series. In addition,USB Are C-type, which will make it difficult to connect existing hardware without the purchase of adapters that complicate the connection and increase the whole business. Another disappointment is that of all the small features that gave Mac his special character. Google logo Dark The back of the screen is not lit, the sound is not recognized when the computer is turned on, and the charger does not connect with Magsafe. Many people will see these features as isoteric but they are an inseparable part of the nature and character of the computer.


    So true, the size of the hard drive begins with 256's SSD Faster (not enough size for anything, certainly not for editing video files), there is a new and more comfortable keyboard as well as Touch ID and Touch Bar. The new MacBook is also lighter and thinner and has a huge Track Pad with Force Touch technology. Are these revolutionary features? You can agree not to. Do they justify the price addition? I'm not at all sure.

    I think you did not understand the concept of the minimum MacBook Pro if your claims against the company are due to your claims about it.

    This device is designed for those who want a "real" laptop with a Core i processor for everyday use and maybe a few edits and 2D graphics, and make an effort to differentiate it from the standard Core Y bottle as well as the big Pro bottle really intended for professional use. This is why the various features have been removed, which is why the low bad model came with a TN screen. Nobody wants you to video with this computer…

  35. Justify Apple. Apple's only commitment is to its shareholders. The new model is still branded as a Pro, which means a computer for professional work. That means Apple wants you to edit a video on this computer. They are also usually the ones who buy it, and at the expense of the workplace, so the price is not the end of the world for them. Now you put your memory card in or plug in your non-dongle mobile storage that costs $ 1. * Courage *

    The alleged reason that the MacBook Air continued to arrive with an inferior TN screen having a low resolution was to keep the 10 hours on average on battery. The real reason was greed, an old-fashioned TN-5 screen much cheaper to manufacture.

    Apple does not currently replace an Air Bottle, nor does it break 13. "They deliberately killed it. It is more profitable to sell a crippled Air Bottle with a nice screen (what they call a bottle) at 1300 Dollar, or what you elegantly call an Air 1500 replacement, than a handy computer. Who has proven himself (with an upgraded screen suppose) on 1000. For god's sake, my 2 Pro 3 Pro has an 3K screen, but people are people, and they will continue to buy bottles (and I can understand why, this is a very nice weight and status symbol) And spit out an inordinate amount of money. In this generation, even the big tech sites are complaining about two USB-C ports, plus the same ROFL, on a computer that starts at $ 1500.

  36. Quote of omrij

    I've been using OSX for years (on PC)

    Can count on one hand the number of times I had a SBBOD

    I've been using Windows 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10 for years, giving me one hand and a trunk to count the number of times I've had BSOD (it happened exactly 0 times), but it doesn't stop Apple from stating that Windows is unstable.

  37. Quote of Milford Cubicle

    I've been using theWindows 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10, I had enough of one hand to count the number of times I had a BSOD (it happened exactly 0 times), but that does not prevent the Dark To argue that Windus is unstable.

    I have a regular BSOD if I try to remove the USB of the computer's wifi (don't read with anything else). Not sure why this is happening. Luckily I don't have to spend like that either. (It could very well be because it's with a USB extension or something with that driver)

  38. I've been using Windows 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10 for years, giving me one hand and a trunk to count the number of times I've had BSOD (it happened exactly 0 times), but it doesn't stop Apple from stating that Windows is unstable.

    I did not argue otherwise, I also use windows at the same time. It was only in response to a statement that osx was unstable.

    1. What an error-filled post.
      DDR4 is more economical than DDR3 and not vice versa, the reason for the RAM RAM on computers is Apple's controller and not because DDR3 does not support it, luxury cameras do not actually use SD cards but CF, UFS standard for external cards does not support card holder SD and more.

  39. In the middle of the 80 when the Macintosh conquered the design world it had: an advanced Windows-based operating system, mouse, graphics software that worked only on Mac and a range of beautiful fonts. The advantage also remains that Microsoft introduced 92 ~ 3.1 windows and added a mouse. In 1995, when I purchased a "PowerPC 8500" Mac, it made no sense: at one-third the price of the Mac could buy the same power, with the 95 + windows and the same graphics software, and mainly enjoy the free software and games (but also viruses) online. The few Mac technicians probably cost much more, as did their peripherals. Knowledge Company as a local monopoly has rendered service poor and expensive.
    Let's be exact: From that point on, there has never been any rational justification for buying an Apple computer, even when Steve Jobs came back with the designed mac, and we haven't even said a word about 3D and video editing tools common to all their libraries.
    Like the iPhone, the interface and the cool operating system have a light added value, but always at the expense of the cost you could enjoy the hardware or the hiccups with much more value added to the designer.

  40. In the case of the iPhone compared to Android and Android, there is a disadvantage because of its clumsy operating system.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button
Close
Close