updating: The patch that fixes the security breaches for Windows 10 is available for manual download for all consumers - you can do this through This link.
The original article: Will consumers need to choose between a slowdown in performance and adequate security that allows them to sleep at night? Is this a gap in my work? Intel Only or all processor keys? It depends who you ask
Reported on the British site The Register He declared (Based on information received From a relatively anonymous Tumblr blog) On a fundamental flaw in the design of the modern labs of the company Intel Which causes their core memory to 'trickle' out, as fixing the problem is likely to lead to a decline in overall performance - creating a massive snowball across the entire network, which continues to roll and evolve with each passing hour, it seems. Is there a reason for panic? Not everyone and not every situation, it seems.
Information that should be secure can be accessed through applications with basic privileges
However, it seems that this is a very specific order of operations that might allow simple applications with basic operating system access to access the kernel of the processor and view information that should be particularly secure And is available only for applications at the maximum access level. Designated malware can exploit this principle to gain access to user passwords, access data, and payment information without being aware that something is wrong.
It is worth noting that defects in the firmware of hardware products are not particularly rare. The major difference this time is the claim that a firmware update to the processors themselves can not solve the problem, and it needs to be addressed at the level of the various operating systems based on Processors In the architecture of thex86-64 Common - which in turn can cause tens of percent damage to system performance (with greater damage to relatively old models). Certainly not something that would please the various consumers who paid hundreds or thousands of shekels for a certain level of ability when purchasing their computer system.
A headache for Intel only,I HAVE D And ARM?
The wave of rumors generated by the original report led to a lot of confusion, fear and anger among users, and required Intel to provide Official response Even before distributing the repairs to the various operating systems extensively and removing the embargo information about the problem itself - in its official publication, the chipmaker stated that it is working closely with its partners to repair the damage, which it defines as not exclusive to its products but is a defect in the way it is designed and built at all The modern processors, including those from home I HAVE D And even those based on the E-ARM And not on x86-64, ostensibly.
The company promised to provide more detailed information about a breach once it opens and unleashes it through dedicated software updates to reduce the potential scope of consumer data - but made it clear that it is not an ability to inject new information, modify or delete it from the system kernel, but read its contents.
There is Signaling On the part of I HAVE D Its products are not exposed to the breach in question and to the performance that may result from its handling - while the company's factors ARM They keep silent, it seems, hoping that they will not be dragged into the whole mess.
Injury of up to 30 percent in performance?
10 has been distributed to consumers who are part of the XNUMX programWindows Insiders (but not the rest) in December, although the first to provide us with a performance comparison between the system at risk and the security system that received the required patch are actually the Linux experts of the Phoronix site,core i7-8700K and the-core i7-6800K and received results that could be a siren, at least to some consumers.
The performance of the compilers has not changed at all, and this gives hope that the performance of most of the features that characterize home users will not be affected while the server world, the information farm, and the HPC world will be Which are at an increased risk of significant damage to output. These are only preliminary conclusions that should be taken with limited discretion, but we are ready for any reason whatsoever to be encouraged.
At this point it seems that simple home users do not necessarily have anything to do about this entire saga. Updates to the various operating systems that will try to block the breach will be distributed as mandatory updates that will be challenging to evade, and the entire process will be behind the scenes and almost transparent. We certainly look forward to hearing more detail about the defect and its significance, but as of now it seems that all we can do is wait for the exams Performence More - and most importantly, hope that the performance impairment demon is not as bad as it has been claimed.