We took the representative of generation processors RYZEN The other in front of his direct replacement for another round of tests - to see what happens when you switch from a two-channel memory to one and only
Since its launch two years ago, Ryzen's processors have been known AMD As those who need memory at higher speeds to get the most out of them, because of their heavy dependence on the built-in memory controller for transmitting information.
Users' habit of taking the cheapest memory kits to the whole system had to change accordingly, and memory producers were legitimized to invest more and lower prices to compete for the consumer's heart. With the Ryzen 2000 series only needed man and the use of memory sets of type DDR4 Over 2666Mhz has become very common.
In this review we wanted to focus mainly on the differences between Ryzen 3000 and Ryzen 2000 and specifically 3700X vs. 2700X when dealing with traffic זיכרון Significantly lower.
Of course, we examine this out of curiosity, but also because the composition of the processor varies significantly between these two generations. While architecture Zen attitude Plus on which the 2700X is based leaves it in monolithic design (a single piece of silicon)RYZEN The 7 3700X contains two pieces of silicon, one of which is the IO controller and the other the cores only.
While in processors like Ryzen 9 3900X and 3950X have 12 and 16 cores there are two sets of cores of 8 each (in 3900X two cores are deactivated in each group), 3700X has only one set of cores, and therefore half of the maximum cache .The Infinity Fabric controller communicates with the memory sticks on the motherboard through a dedicated controller and transfers them in two internal channels to the core sets in a full Zen2 processor. While 3700X is one such GMI2 channel, so you know, the speed of processor memory writing is half as much as a full processor. What is the meaning of the new PLCs for reading operations and how this is expressed when drastically changing speed זיכרון System.
For this we took Ryzen 7 2700X and Ryzen 7 3700X together with the kit זיכרון And we checked what happens when we work with a single channel of זיכרון Compared to two channels. The purpose of this experiment is to show the efficiency of memory controllers as well as to answer the question "Does running a Zen2-based system with זיכרון A single is a legitimate choice, at least for now? ". It could very well be that the motherboard has 2 interfaces זיכרון Only a user will want to run a single stick of 16GB now, and maybe add one in the future.
Our test system includes the Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi Motherboard along with the Geforce RTX 2080 graphics card and kit זיכרון D80 sample made ADATA. This memory kit comes with an XMP XXUMX-17-18-18 XMP 38 profile at 3600Mhz speed.
We ran this assessment in a two-channel configuration, completely standardized, and then we took one stick. For comparison, working with a single channel in such a situation would be significantly slower even than working with זיכרון 2133Mhz on dual channel. Today, the most common memory kits at low prices already contain 2666Mhz-3200Mhz operating speeds at fairly good times, but any speed זיכרון Another lower one is not really relevant to the buyer today.
In our rendering test in the blender, the differences between a single channel and two channels are very minimal and stand at 2% with the 2700X, but right on the standard deviation line with the 3700X that does not lose performance at all.
The Winrar test shows the differences that are created in writing on the processors. Here the differences are quite large. The 2700X loses almost 40% performance and the 3700X loses only 18%. The improvement between the two processors in dealing with a shortage of speed זיכרון It is especially large.
In the Overwatch game we noticed relatively subtle performance losses, even at the average minimum frame rate. This is good news for people who are interested in this title.
In the Metro Exodus title under fairly high game settings, depending on the video card capability we saw a relatively low performance loss on average, but the minimum amount of frames per second was mostly affected by the 2700X.
Like the Metro, the new Tomb Raider is also known as one that is dramatically affected by hardware speed changes, and is a fairly extreme case for demonstration purposes. Here, a decrease to one channel in 3700X reduced the average frame rate per second by 5% and 2700X by 18%. The improvement in the processor structure seems to have a dramatic effect on dealing with such situations.
It seems that at least when it comes to games and rindor, work on one channel with processors RYZEN 3000 based on Zen2 core is not an option to eliminate system performance at all.
The improvement made between these two generations of processors can be seen as the dramatic reduction in the loss of performance between two channels זיכרון Only one channel.
What this means about choosing the memory system RYZEN 3000?
Of course we do not recommend any new system based Ryzen 3000 to use a stick זיכרון Single. However, with the not particularly large differences, especially in games, it can be understood that the need for the fastest possible memory should not exist in any system that is being built. What we have tested here is the situation between the kit זיכרון 3600Mhz is fairly fast and the mode produces performance זיכרון Falling system 2133Mhz.
There is nothing wrong with selecting a cheap 2666Mhz-3000Mhz memory pack for new Ryzen 3000 systems. Building a system and considering using one or another memory stick now and then upgrading to two? This is not a problem, performance differences will often be very low, and these I think are the best news from the improved architecture AMD In a processor between these two generations.
In the last few days we have presented you with kits זיכרון Many at funny prices, and we really believe there is no need for more systems RYZEN 3000 news, probably at a time when even a 16GB kit at 3000Mhz is dropping below the VAT line.
For the improvement and alignment of the line with Intel for memory compatibility and its impact, AMD.