[nextpage title = "Introduction"]The greatest enemy of the family core i5 comes under review - RYZEN 5 3600X is a six-core processor that has already begun to take its place in the market as a kind of user, and you are welcome to continue reading and find out if it deserves all the compliments
Since launching AMD The Ryzen 3000 processors on July 7 this year began an effect we have not known for many years in the hardware world. Many users outside the limited Internet circles have also begun to adopt AMD As a worthy candidate and an option to buy, even here in Israel, a country that knows you all Intel Desktop processors must be by default.
If Ryzen 1000 processors have aroused interest, and Ryzen 2000 processors constitute a landslide, Ryzen 3000 is the tsunami of the desktop processor world. Whether rightly or not, in some circles these processors are seen as the preferred and sometimes the only option. You see this in many diverse communities across the internet. This is indicative of a lot of the public's perception of not just processors AMD The new ones, but also to the processors Intel Existing ones.
The "hype" was created for a simple reason - the four-core barrier that we have become accustomed to over many generations of processors has been broken Intel As a standard for a user who does not want to spend huge sums in an Extreme Bracket. Within three years, we were able to get 6 cores for $ 400 (processor core i7 6800K) for 130 dollars only, price RYZEN 5 2600 today with maintaining the processing power available in the product. Advances in cost-effectiveness are undeniable.
One of the most important target audiences for processor manufacturers is those that are in the price range between NIS 700 and NIS 1200. This market is especially popular for gamers, amateur content creators, and anyone who doesn't need eight-core or more monstrous processors (thoughAMD Be sure to "destroy" it too with availability of 8 processors from previous generations).
As with Intel processors, so are processors AMD Divided into four different levels of performance. Ryzen 3 is the lowest, usually at prices of 75-125 dollars. The Ryzen 5 is a category that targets the range between 175 and 300 dollars. The latest Ryzen 7 processors are in the range between 300 and 500 dollars and Ryzen 9 is a premium series with Processors Lying from 500 dollars.
The two main differences between these processors are that the 3600 comes with Cooling A relatively simple Wraith Stealth compared to Wraith Spire in 3600X, and broadcasted a slightly higher 3600X operation.
While the operating frequency of RYZEN 5 3600 is 3.6Ghz with maximum turbocharged 4.2Ghz for a single core, theRYZEN 5 3600X comes at 3.8Ghz frequency and maximum turbo frequency for one core of 4.4Ghz.
In practice, the operating frequencies of these two processors are very close. In fact, at this stage of the review, I will say that it is a bit difficult to choose 3600X with a difference of 50 dollars, which you can buy Cooling Advanced and only using the 3600 processor alone will close the performance gap.
The Ryzen 5 3600X contains 6 physical cores and 12 capillaries thanks to SMT (RU Simultaneous Multithreading) technology. Electricity below. There are two silicon chips below the lid. Allocated silicon toAMD Factory TSMC That produces for her.
At a cost of about NIS 1100 in the country, the Core i5 9600K is the rival of the Ryzen 5 3600X. The Ryzen 5 processor 3600 sold for about NIS X less. Criticizing the 3700X and 3900X processors You will find more information about the X570 platform. The Ryzen 5 3600X along with its X-free brother come to the AM4 bracket and fit almost any Motherboard The owner of the currently sold bracket includes those based on B450 and X470 for example. Of course, the manufacturer's website must be verified.
Let's move on to the performance tests and see how this processor copes with the competition
[nextpage title = "Performance Tests & Summary"]
For Ryzen 3000 processor exams, we formulated the existing exam system and created a clean and ready one. Installation of Windows 10 in the 1903 version along with the updated drivers for the X570 chipset. God-RYZEN 5 3600 is specifically tested with bios that include the updated AGESA ABBA version for enhanced turbo frequencies.
It is important for me again to emphasize the difference between Performence Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 without X is very small, and usually negligible. Feel free to refer to the performance results of Ryzen 5 3600 as well, especially and Overclocking Easy planned.
The technical specifications of the processor testing system include:
- Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Pro for Intel
- Asus Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi X570 for AMD
- ADATA DDR4 2X8GB 3600Mhz
- ADATA SP610 512GB + Toshiba Vertex 460 256GB SSD
- Noctua NH-U12A
- Corsair HX 1050W
- Palit GeForce RTX 2080 GamingPro
I decided to choose the RTX 2080 graphics card to form the basis of all gaming exams due to the fact that its given graphics power is similar to many advanced video cards currently on the market. Within the range of 20% of it is a series Radeon RX 5700 alongside RTX 2060 Super andRTX 2070 Super. Of course you can also considerRTX 2080 Super by comparison.
The goal is not to create a bottleneck as large as possible for processors, but to create a realistic state of the art computer system that will be purchased or upgraded this year or later. Exam resolutions are 1920 × 1080 and 2560 × 1440.
Built-in CPUs did not let you go crazy with frequencies and auto overclocking. Intel uses a standard turbo, andAMD In XFR which is the equivalent technology. If any Overclocking, It is specified in the frequency named CPU.
In Overwatch we see a not bad performance at all from the 3600X when especially at the 1440P it shows the same performance as the processors Intel Faster today, especially with a minimal amount of frames per second.
The Witcher 3 game performance differences are also relatively small on average, but in the minimum amount of frames per second, the 3600X stands firm against the processorscore i5. Its performance is slightly lower than that of core i5 8600K but not seriously or noticeably.
The Metro Exodus game shows priority to processors Intel, A patchwork patch may help reduce gaps, but it may not. At this time, in the exam system, the 3600X is about 3.5% behind thecore i5 8600K. Again, the difference is relatively small, but is beyond the standard deviation range of about 2%.
The racing game F1 2018 continues the trend we are seeing so far. At 1080P the 3600X is weaker by 6% of 8600K. In 1440P only weak by 1.5%, on the standard deviation line. The minimum amount of frames measured is better in 3600X in this situation.
The GTA V game is the extreme in my opinion among processors AMD To my employees Intel Latest. When using RTX 2080, a difference of 11% was observed between the 8600K and 3600X. This is the difference that can be expressed alone in the segmentation between the two graphic cards To varying degrees today. Admittedly, the game is relatively old, and works great in both systems anyway. For your judgment.
In the Shadow of the Tomb Raider game there is transport Performence Small to 8600K in 1080P but the transport is reversed in favor of the 3600X at 1440P resolution. This makes it clear that as the bottleneck moves more toward the graphics card, the 3600X manages to hold the situation better.
The test3DMark Time Spy for Dessert Graphics Tests shows the 3600X indirect over the 8600K across all possible parameters.
Blender rendering test is one of the serious strengths of processors RYZEN The present. In the scene rendering test, the 3600X finishes to Render even before the significantly expensive 8700K finishes. The 8600K processor is tens of percent slow at the end of rendering.
The Cinebench Rendering Test uses the Cinema4D engine for scene rendering and gives a score based on speed. In this test, too, the 3600X finishes even before the 8700K finishes, and tens of percent faster than the 8600K.
In Winrar's contraction test, the 3600X shows great capabilities. I think the benefit to Ryzen 3000 processors in this test comes from quantities זיכרון The mighty cache they have. 32MB for six cores is the highest ratio we have seen in the industry so far.
Handbrake is a video conversion software between formats and weights and resolutions, and different coding methods. In this test we converted a specific video in4k To 1080P and we measured the conversion time. Here the Ryzen 5 3600X finished ahead of the 8600K in a small amount of time. indeed, The fast 8600K closes the gap and flies by.
The system's power consumption with the 3600X is quite acceptable. It is higher than the 8600K, but due to the wider heat dissipation into the processor cover, the 3600X is not a processor that has difficulty in its cooling.
The Ryzen 5 3600X Processor is a worthy processor for many uses, especially for users who do more things beyond gaming. In the game tests, it is clear that the hands of the Core i5 8600K and therefore the Core i5 9600K are also on top. These Processors Who are considered to be the fastest in gaming even in front of their older siblings core i7 andcore i9. Although, most of the differences are very small and not significant at all.
In various rendering tests the Ryzen 5 3600X is a fast, very fast processor. In these tests the speed is similar to that of thecore i7 8700K most often.
The Ryzen 5 3600 processor is not significantly different from the X model, and with the relatively large price difference only the use of more advanced cooling will bring the two to the same point Performence At the same price. Therefore, I will relate to him in this comparison as well. As a processor costing less than 150, the payoff seems to have grown significantly.
Performance that we used to get at NIS 1100 and more receive a lower price tag of less than NIS 900 in this generation with the 3600. Is it always possible to recommend the 3600 and 3600X as recommended processors for each user? Well, it depends on the user himself. I still see situations where purchasing a Core i5 9400F processor (similar to the 8400 speed illustrated here) is not a crime against humanity. These are all still Processors Quick for gaming at a similar price.
Concern begins to emerge when thinking about the future, and such a thought exercise can be done precisely by looking back. The widespread argument is that a processor with wider processing resources will allow a greater lifespan for the computer system, such as taking a Core i5 processor versus a Core i7 processor of five years or more. In practice, this test has not yet proved too much. Processors Multi-capillary owners usually end their lives similar to other processors in the same family that do not contain multi-capillary technology. It is very likely that this is the ability to launch a processor that also does not include the technology and gain success, something we currently hear mostly about rumors for the Ryzen 5 family that will not include SMT. As well, Core i5 processors do not appear to be launching anytime soon. Probably it will take another launch or two of Processors, So their heads are still over the water thanks to their great gaming performance.
Because I physically do not have the Ryzen 5 3600 processor (it is not included in the review kits from AMD), I am unable to award it a recommended medal, although I would strongly recommend it because of the X version. Examples across the network when there are Cooling It is appropriate on both versions, in fact, very small differences in operating frequencies are observed, sometimes tens of megahertz.
Surely there is another fairly successful product here fromAMD, And I'm curious to see how the chip maker will continue with its desktop processors this year and next year with a generation RYZEN New and improved.