Performance tests and summary
For Ryzen 3000 processor exams, we formulated the existing exam system and created a clean and ready one. Installation of Windows 10 in the 1903 version along with the updated drivers for the X570 chipset. God-RYZEN 5 3600 is specifically tested with bios that include the updated AGESA ABBA version for enhanced turbo frequencies.
It is important for me to emphasize again that the difference between the performance of the Ryzen 5 3600X and the 3600 without X is very small, and often even negligible. Feel free to treat the performance results as such of the Ryzen 5 3600 as well, especially and Overclocking Easy planned.
The technical specifications of the processor testing system include:
- Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Pro for Intel
- Asus Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi X570 for AMD
- ADATA DDR4 2X8GB 3600Mhz
- ADATA SP610 512GB + Toshiba Vertex 460 256GB SSD
- Noctua NH-U12A
- Corsair HX 1050W
- Palit GeForce RTX 2080 GamingPro
I decided to choose the RTX 2080 graphics card to form the basis of all gaming exams due to the fact that its given graphics power is similar to many advanced video cards currently on the market. Within the range of 20% of it is a series Radeon RX 5700 alongside RTX 2060 Super andRTX 2070 Super. Of course you can also considerRTX 2080 Super by comparison.
The goal is not to create as large a bottleneck for processors as possible, but to create a realistic situation for an advanced computer system that will be purchased or upgraded this year or later. Exam resolutions are 1920 × 1080 and 2560 × 1440.
Built-in CPUs did not let you go crazy with frequencies and auto overclocking. Intel uses a standard turbo, andAMD In XFR which is the equivalent technology. If any Overclocking, It is specified in the frequency named CPU.
In Overwatch we see a not bad performance at all from the 3600X when especially at the 1440P it shows the same performance as the processors Intel Faster today, especially with a minimal amount of frames per second.
The Witcher 3 game performance differences are also relatively small on average, but in the minimum amount of frames per second, the 3600X stands firm against the processorsCore i5. Its performance is slightly lower than that of Core i5 8600K but not seriously or noticeably.
The Metro Exodus game shows priority to processors Intel, A patchwork patch may help reduce gaps, but it may not. At this time, in the exam system, the 3600X is about 3.5% behind theCore i5 8600K. Again, the difference is relatively small, but is beyond the standard deviation range of about 2%.
The racing game F1 2018 continues the trend we are seeing so far. At 1080P the 3600X is weaker by 6% of 8600K. In 1440P only weak by 1.5%, on the standard deviation line. The minimum amount of frames measured is better in 3600X in this situation.
The GTA V game is the extreme in my opinion among processors AMD To my employees Intel Latest. When using RTX 2080, a difference of 11% was observed between the 8600K and 3600X. This is the difference that can be expressed alone in the segmentation between the two graphic cards To varying degrees today. Admittedly, the game is relatively old, and works great in both systems anyway. For your judgment.
In the game Shadow of the tomb raider There is a small performance lead to the 8600K at 1080P but the lead is reversed in favor of the 3600X at 1440P resolution. This makes it clear that when the bottleneck moves more towards the video card the 3600X manages to hold the situation better.
The test3DMark Time Spy for Dessert Graphics Tests shows the 3600X indirect over the 8600K across all possible parameters.
Blender rendering test is one of the serious strengths of processors RYZEN The present. In the scene rendering test, the 3600X finishes to Render even before the significantly expensive 8700K finishes. The 8600K processor is tens of percent slow at the end of rendering.
The Cinebench Rendering Test uses the Cinema4D engine for scene rendering and gives a score based on speed. In this test, too, the 3600X finishes even before the 8700K finishes, and tens of percent faster than the 8600K.
In Winrar's contraction test, the 3600X shows great capabilities. I think the benefit to Ryzen 3000 processors in this test comes from quantities זיכרון The mighty cache they have. 32MB for six cores is the highest ratio we have seen in the industry so far.
Handbrake is a video conversion software between formats and weights and resolutions, and different coding methods. In this test we converted a specific video in4k To 1080P and we measured the conversion time. Here the Ryzen 5 3600X finished ahead of the 8600K in a small amount of time. indeed, The fast 8600K closes the gap and flies by.
The power consumption of the system with the 3600X is quite acceptable. Although it is higher than that of the 8600K, due to the wider heat dissipation to the processor cover, the 3600X is not a processor that has difficulty cooling it.
The Ryzen 5 3600X Processor is a worthy processor for many uses, especially for users who do more things beyond gaming. In the game tests, it is clear that the hands of the Core i5 8600K and therefore the Core i5 9600K are also on top. These Processors Who are considered to be the fastest in gaming even in front of their older siblings Core i7 andCore i9. Although, most of the differences are very small and not significant at all.
In various rendering tests the Ryzen 5 3600X is a fast, very fast processor. In these tests the speed is similar to that of theCore i7 8700K most often.
Laboratory-RYZEN 5 3600 is not significantly different from the X model, and with the relatively large price difference only the use of more advanced cooling will bring the two to the same performance point at the same price. Therefore, I will also refer to it in this comparison. As a processor that costs about NIS 150 less, it seems that the value has increased significantly.
Performance that we used to get at NIS 1100 and more receive a lower price tag of less than NIS 900 in this generation with the 3600. Is it always possible to recommend the 3600 and 3600X as recommended processors for each user? Well, it depends on the user himself. I still see situations where purchasing a Core i5 9400F processor (similar to the 8400 speed illustrated here) is not a crime against humanity. These are all still Processors Quick for gaming at a similar price.
Concern begins to emerge when thinking about the future, and such a thought exercise can be done precisely by looking back. The widespread argument is that a processor with wider processing resources will allow a greater lifespan for the computer system, such as taking a Core i5 processor versus a Core i7 processor of five years or more. In practice, this test has not yet proved too much. Processors Multi-capillary owners have usually ended their lives similar to other processors in the same family that do not contain multi-capillary technology. It is very possible that this reason is the ability to launch a processor that also does not include the technology and be successful, something we are currently hearing about mainly in rumors for a processor for the Ryzen 5 family that will not include SMT. As well, it does not look like Core i5 processors will become irrelevant any time soon. It's probably going to take another launch or two of Processors, So their heads are still over the water thanks to their great gaming performance.
Because I physically do not have the Ryzen 5 3600 processor (it is not included in the review kits from AMD), I am unable to award it a recommended medal, although I would strongly recommend it because of the X version. Examples across the network when there are Cooling It is appropriate on both versions, in fact, very small differences in operating frequencies are observed, sometimes tens of megahertz.
Surely there is another fairly successful product here fromAMD, And I'm curious to see how the chip maker will continue with its desktop processors this year and next year with a generation RYZEN New and improved.