The performance of the Fury X begins to flow into the network: the best there is? • HWzone
Computersgraphic cards

The performance of the Fury X begins to flow into the network: the best there is?

A few days after the impressive launch, the technical details about the new flagship products of The graphics processing market is beginning to become clear, and test results are also coming with them First and promising

Get updates from everyone in TelgramGet updates from us all at TelgramJoin the channel now


AMD 's launch party for graphics card generation Her new This week Provided us A first glimpse of the Fury X card leading the list with a full and formidable Fiji core, but unlike similar launches this time around, we didn't see pre-prepared reviews being published in tandem with the announcement - which ultimately left us with some question marks, first and foremost about the performance that will provide us Actual 4,096 execution units with 4GB's HBM bandwidth is unprecedented.

Now, a few days later, the picture is beginning to clear. Official reviews are not yet available (they will arrive next week, in conjunction with the official launch of 24 in June), but extensive technical details and initial performance evidence are available.

fr10
You can not argue, the Fury X is a monster in every sense of the word. Little Fury's data has not yet been fully disclosed, and will be officially launched only in the middle of next month

Most of the results we have come from official modeled documents from AMD itself, and the other part from performance tests whose credibility is not 100 percent clear, so everything one sees with a trace of skepticism - but the bottom line, it seems The Fury X Will indeed offer very close competition both GeForce Titan X And to Ti, and will even surpass them in some cases.

fr7

fr3fr4

The competition is very tight, but the Fury X leads in almost every situation - according to AMD tests

It is not certain that we will be able to decide which of these three are entitled to be defined as the most powerful single-party card in the world for the yearOr a little less), But the very fact that AMD was able to catch up with a gap so large that it opened Over the past year and a half, it has been very impressive - all the more so when you consider a declared average power consumption of 275 watts for the Fury X, which is not too far from the thermal envelope of competitors from Which stands on the 250 watts.

fr6 fr5

More benchmark results that do not come directly from Paint a very optimistic situation for the red manufacturer, although even in this case objectivity and reliability are not absolute for us

Thermal envelope and average consumption are of course different terms and therefore the differences in power consumption can be measured and tested only in practice, but nevertheless it seems that this is an impressive efficiency leap against the R9 290X and R9 390X, which are also characterized by power consumption of 275 watts.

It is already cautious that in the gaming arena, Fury X's superior performance or GTX 980 Ti's superior performance (which usually amounts to a few percent against the direct competitor) will be determined primarily by the manufacturer's identity that supported and helped develop that specific title - when -AMD will naturally get a 'March shot' in its titles, whereas On the other hand, it will lead its partners.

In conclusion, we will ask you the obvious question - Radeon R9 Fury X או GeForce GTX 980 TiWhat is your choice?

fr2fr1

We are eagerly awaiting the launch of 24 in June, and you?


Tags

8 תגובות

  1. Not elegant and more with this sting attached to the card

    Waiting for its nidia in the 16 nanometer manufacturing process

  2. Comparison is not so worth ..
    Take a water-cooling card against an air-cooler (stock-blower) and compare them so it is clear that the water-cooled card can make a bigger boost to its performance and bypass air cooling

  3. Water cooling is the stock cooling.
    It says something about the heat emission of this card ...

  4. If what is written here is true (and very likely it is not) then the card should be with a consumption similar to GTX980TI or TITAN X.
    http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-r9-fury-teardown-pcb-liquid-cooling-pump-block-pictured/
    If I heard correctly Linus said that AMD set a temperature ceiling of 75 degrees to FURY X which is also a very strange statistic (both AMD and NVIDIA usually aim for 85-95 degrees and even more).
    They may have a problem with the HBM that requires them to limit the temperature this way and to overcome it they used the most extreme cooling that has been on a video card to date.

  5. Water cooling is the stock cooling. It says something about the heat emission of this card ...

    There will also be an air-cooled version that if the blower fries the card and if it is with normal fans then they will not know who

  6. There is no FURY X with air cooling, only FURY and NANO will come with air cooling (weaker cores).
    In general, it seems as if the AMD cooling fixtures for this series are much better than the cooling ones they usually use, so it probably doesn't look like a bad blower or a fan, not who knows what.

  7. There is no FURY X with air cooling, only the FURY and NANO will come with air cooling (weaker cores). In general, it seems as if the AMD cooling fixtures for this series are much better than the cooling ones they usually use, so it probably doesn't look like a bad blower or a fan, not who knows what.

    I understood very much thanks for the detailed answer

Leave a Reply

Back to top button
Close
Close